arslanweb
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 13
Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 4
|
 |
« Reply #275 on: January 17, 2010, 08:42:13 08:42 » |
|
See attachment for new storage details
...remember its private!!!
bunion
What is the right password of the "HCPIC18-std-9.51PL2.rar" files. Regarts
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
waicon
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 134
Thank You
-Given: 59
-Receive: 79
I'm learning to Dream...not Relaxing...zzZ
|
 |
« Reply #276 on: January 17, 2010, 09:40:27 09:40 » |
|
refer to: reply from bunion at page 11, Reply #274 « Reply #274 on: January 03, 2010, 06:35:19 06:35 »
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
manofthe_day
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #277 on: January 19, 2010, 07:54:17 19:54 » |
|
hello every one please somebody pls post the universal patcher for the latest hitech pic c compiler only please and please because i cant get down that huge 17*mb of file .
somebody pls help.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bunion
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 701
Thank You
-Given: 660
-Receive: 4122
|
 |
« Reply #278 on: January 20, 2010, 02:42:26 02:42 » |
|
Dont make uni patcher now Heres patcher for latest picc pro 9.70 HTPICP 970.rarbunion
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bunion
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 701
Thank You
-Given: 660
-Receive: 4122
|
 |
« Reply #280 on: January 21, 2010, 08:46:10 20:46 » |
|
Heres patcher for latest picc18 pro 0.63 pl3 HTPICP18 963PL3.rarIF NOT latest le me know bunion
|
|
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 08:51:12 20:51 by bunion »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mitsos
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 868
Thank You
-Given: 3168
-Receive: 4784
|
 |
« Reply #281 on: January 21, 2010, 10:08:39 22:08 » |
|
hi
recently I check the optimisation between v8.05PL2 (full version),v9.65PL1 and last v9.70PL0.
I do that with a keeloq project (based on an745) and I see these:
version size(code words) optimisation level 8.05PL2 2084 no 8.05PL2 1321 max 9.65PL1(pro) 1816 min 9.65PL1(pro) 1268 max 9.70PL0(pro) 1779 min 9.70PL0(pro) 1295 max 9.65PL1(lite) 2304 no 9.70PL0(lite) 2241 no
it is obvious that engineers of hitech thinking like a fox... in the lite versions the optimiser operates in the opposite way:deoptimiser...! and by this way the optimiser in the pro version seems to optimise the size of code more than it trully do so.
regards mitsos
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oldvan
Senior Member
  
Offline
Posts: 372
Thank You
-Given: 154
-Receive: 107
If the van is a Rockin'...
|
 |
« Reply #282 on: January 21, 2010, 10:55:10 22:55 » |
|
it is obvious that engineers of hitech thinking like a fox... in the lite versions the optimiser operates in the opposite way:deoptimiser...! and by this way the optimiser in the pro version seems to optimise the size of code more than it trully do so. Did you have a peek at the .LST files and find their excess baggage? I'd be interested to know the real difference. Is it possible the new version has errata workarounds not found in the earlier version, and creates somewhat bulkier code as a result but will thus make your device more reliable? An example from the 18F452:  We are only using 220 bytes or 11% more ROM with the LITE version they give away for free. The new compiler still does 2% better on MAX setting, which is a nerdy selling point.
|
|
« Last Edit: January 21, 2010, 10:59:03 22:59 by oldvan »
|
Logged
|
Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and he will sit around in a boat drinking beer all day.
|
|
|
chyelim
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 81
Thank You
-Given: 760
-Receive: 134
|
 |
« Reply #283 on: January 24, 2010, 04:26:05 16:26 » |
|
Mirror link for PICC18 PRO 9.63 PL3 + Patch Megaupload http://www.megaupload.com/?d=JTWZ938T
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devfirat
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 65
Thank You
-Given: 17
-Receive: 82
|
 |
« Reply #284 on: February 03, 2010, 12:13:36 00:13 » |
|
I have win7 64 bit os. I installed my computer those programs and crack it but when i did project and compiled it it said "hi-tech is lite". Do you know that problem and how can i solve this? I have 4gb ram and i can't go back 32bit because of this version of win hav 3.25gb ram max. How can i solve this, please help me? Thanks for everyone...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bunion
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 701
Thank You
-Given: 660
-Receive: 4122
|
 |
« Reply #285 on: February 04, 2010, 12:20:20 00:20 » |
|
get latest versions as the packs in sticky are old...see my attachment above or better still latest picc + picc18 have been linked by members few posts above  bunion
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
50caliber
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 141
Thank You
-Given: 174
-Receive: 863
|
 |
« Reply #286 on: February 04, 2010, 07:38:59 19:38 » |
|
Links in sticky (top of page) updated. Old info in sticky was: Post back if there are any problems. Thanks for all your hard work, Bunion.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bunion
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 701
Thank You
-Given: 660
-Receive: 4122
|
 |
« Reply #287 on: February 04, 2010, 09:12:58 21:12 » |
|
Nice one bro!  bunion
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
juabba
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 33
Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 0
|
 |
« Reply #288 on: February 10, 2010, 04:15:31 16:15 » |
|
pls help
the internal pass.txt pass do not work for the extract file of:
HCPICP-pro-9.60PL5.rar
or with
HI-TECH Enterprise Edition.rar
will appreciate information thanks juan
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
50caliber
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 141
Thank You
-Given: 174
-Receive: 863
|
 |
« Reply #289 on: February 11, 2010, 12:54:54 12:54 » |
|
pls help
the internal pass.txt pass do not work for the extract file of:
HCPICP-pro-9.60PL5.rar
or with
HI-TECH Enterprise Edition.rar
will appreciate information thanks juan
Sonsivri works for me.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
juabba
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 33
Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 0
|
 |
« Reply #290 on: February 12, 2010, 12:44:30 00:44 » |
|
thanks a lot 50caliber  it works An aditional basic question pls I want to install hi-tec C pro for c-18 family + c_wiz . Wonder which of several installation packages into the "htbun3" download should be used thanks in advance juan
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bunion
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 701
Thank You
-Given: 660
-Receive: 4122
|
 |
« Reply #291 on: February 12, 2010, 04:28:38 04:28 » |
|
Why not just use the single of 18 pro latest above bunion
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DrSurfer
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 19
Thank You
-Given: 27
-Receive: 2
|
 |
« Reply #292 on: February 18, 2010, 04:37:57 16:37 » |
|
Does someone as a cure to install 9.70 on an ancient Windows 2000 machine?
For the curious, the 9.70 installer uses some kernel.dll functions that are available from XP SP1 and above. I don't know if the same happens to the program(s) too, because I'm stuck at install.
DrSurfer
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bunion
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 701
Thank You
-Given: 660
-Receive: 4122
|
 |
« Reply #293 on: February 18, 2010, 05:15:24 17:15 » |
|
this is a guess but you could try placing an xp kernel32.dll inside your compilers folder and see if it runs...when installing have it alongside the insta.ller exe
bunion
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DrSurfer
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 19
Thank You
-Given: 27
-Receive: 2
|
 |
« Reply #294 on: February 22, 2010, 09:19:45 09:19 » |
|
No, bunion, I tried this way but it doesn't work. Win2k kernel32.dll is already loaded and all references are taken from it.
Anyway I was succesful installing the compiler on a Vista machine and copying the directory and the related registry keys to the old PC, it was simpler than we thought. I tried a compilation and it seems to works fine.
DrSurfer
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
marcodassi
Junior Member
  Muted
Offline
Posts: 40
Thank You
-Given: 73
-Receive: 26
|
 |
« Reply #295 on: February 25, 2010, 02:44:52 14:44 » |
|
Hello bunion!!! Long time.... Straight to the point: I'm moving from STD to PRO 9.63PL3 (PIC18), and found a lot of problems... well, at least the compiler compiles and the proggie "seems" to work, but there's a lot of bugs... some of 'em are reported on release notes too (i.e. multidimensional array of pointers problem, the compiler can't calc the correct size!!! very annoying!!!!!) On the hi-tech forums, btw, there are some references on a "9.63 PL4" version, not counting a "9.64 release candidate": "The header file is broken for the 13K22/14K22 on 9.63PL3. You'll probably have to move to PL4. " "Downloaded 'HI-TECH C Compiler for PIC18 MCUs v9.64 Release Candidate' from PIC W.I.P. forum and this worked near perfectly."Weeeeell, any possibility to get 'em??? I'll hate to move back to STD 'cause the PRO saves me a lot of code rom, and I've almost filled up the PIC (18F4525). In the meantime I'll try to search if I can find 'em!!! Thanks!!! And God bless! UPDATE:Just tested the 9.64 Release Candidate... and, apart from the header files change (they're moving to Microchip C18 style, it requires some modifications in your source), a lot of bugs seems to be gone... and the code is smaller than ever!  Bunion, you can grab it here: h**p://forum.htsoft.com/all/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/147962/Main/138462/ ... it's a 45-day PRO demo... waiting for your cure ANOTHER UPDATE:Well, it seems that they've fixed a lot of very annoying bugs from previous release (PICC-18 PRO 9.63 PL3), a lot of them were really NASTY and could crash all your programs (and drive you mad figuring out what's happened)... so I say: DON'T USE PICC-18 PRO 9.63 PL3 ... it's REALLY a MESS of DIRTY NASTY BUGS, and it will make your program UNSTABLE and NOT WORKING!!!  Instead, wait for the great cure from our great Mr. Bunion for PICC-18 PRO 9.64 Release Candidate 
|
|
« Last Edit: February 25, 2010, 04:44:51 16:44 by marcodassi »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fasa
Inactive
Offline
Posts: 1
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 0
|
 |
« Reply #296 on: February 27, 2010, 06:28:30 18:28 » |
|
If it is possible, could someone upload sticky files to rapidshare please?
|
|
|
Logged
|
if there had been a quantitative proportion between the importance of quantity and qualification then qualification must had be the one that reside closer to the whole value.
|
|
|
50caliber
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 141
Thank You
-Given: 174
-Receive: 863
|
 |
« Reply #297 on: February 28, 2010, 05:34:26 17:34 » |
|
If it is possible, could someone upload sticky files to rapidshare please?
Multiupload mirrors files to multiple file sharing sites including rapidshare. Have you tried the rapidshare links?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bunion
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 701
Thank You
-Given: 660
-Receive: 4122
|
 |
« Reply #298 on: March 04, 2010, 04:17:24 04:17 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
marcodassi
Junior Member
  Muted
Offline
Posts: 40
Thank You
-Given: 73
-Receive: 26
|
 |
« Reply #299 on: March 04, 2010, 07:02:04 07:02 » |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 04, 2010, 07:05:43 07:05 by marcodassi »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|