Hi-Tech PIC Compiler latest versions

[Top]

HI-TECH Universal RSA Keygen

* HI-TECH Universal RSA Keygen generates real RSA signed activation data.
* Replaces HI-TECH RSA public key with self-generated RSA key - different every time!
* Generates permanent PRO key - no expiry date!
* Tested with:

• HI-TECH C Compiler for PIC10-12-16 MCUs
• HI-TECH C PRO for the PIC18 MCU Family
• HI-TECH C PRO for the PIC32 MCU Family
• HI-TECH for dsPIC-PIC24
• HI-TECH C PRO for the Silicon Labs 8051 MCU Family
• HI-TECH C PRO for the PSoC Mixed-Signal Array
• HI-TECH C for Holtek MCU
• HI-TECH PICC-18 STD

* New in version 2.2

• Enhanced error detection & reporting.
• 64-bit version included.
• Includes CLEAN.BAT to remove HI-TECH data from VirtualStore.
  See http://www.sonsivri.com/forum/index.php?topic=935.msg99989#msg99989

* New in version 2.3

• Updated to support HI-TECH C Compiler for PIC10-12-16 MCUs V9.71a.
  See http://www.sonsivri.com/forum/index.php?topic=935.msg101920#msg101920

HI-TECH Universal RSA Keygen (v2.0)
http://depositfiles.com/files/kj9mws7yh

HI-TECH Universal RSA Keygen (v2.1)
http://depositfiles.com/files/oy699bhti

HI-TECH Universal RSA Keygen (v2.2)
http://depositfiles.com/files/2mhscdmb4

HI-TECH Universal RSA Keygen (v2.3)
http://depositfiles.com/files/v6vup2azq


You can find 50caliber post here, the older sticky:
http://www.sonsivri.com/forum/index.php?topic=935.msg69111#msg69111

[manish12]

www.sonsivri.com

bunions_carboot

need more pw for int rar.

[0sLtEd43bZ5z]

don't be lazy. check previous posts - specially bunions.
also check text files in dropboks.

[Memoly]

Ok done ..

New patcher for HI-TECH PIC18_PRO_963PL3 added to storage

storage stops me upping anyrthing over 10mb now so the actuall PIC18_PRO_963PL3 installer
has'nt been added ok

bunion

Hi bunion,

Thank you for your works. I'm using Win7 Ultimate 64 bit. I installed MPLAB 8.40 first. And then installed PIC18_PRO_963PL3 by using your instructions (serial number indicated and off-line activation). Before reg file, I changed installation folder in it and applied it. I patched 2 exe files exactly like you mentioned with your patcher (33 bytes patched succesffuly for both). But the compiler still says it is in lite mode. I uninstalled hitech picc18 pro, delete reg keys and re-install, but the result doesn't change. For the third time, I installed it in demo mode (45 days), and applied your patch. Now it says the compiler is in demo mode but will expire on 2029. Is it normal?

Thanks.

[RedAlert]

New Major version(v9.70) is out for PIC10/12/16 - http://www.htsoft.com/news/#news491
if someone has time to handle a fix for it...

Download link: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=3KVA9X4O

Thanks in advance.

[alien]

Just compiled one old small project(MCU = 16F676 with 1 kw flash) using above mentioned piccPRO9.70(installed and activated 45 days PRO mode)...errors croped up saying lack of flash by some xx bytes....but this just compiles ok(total flash used = 946 words) using picc standard 9.60pl3....seems it is`nt upto the mark as claimed by htsoft.....I dont know what happend to HTSOFT peoples...old staff might have left the organisation...once they used to be best compiler developers(clever too).

[vovchik02]

I don't now why, but PICC PRO make bigger code - working project in STD ~500 word of flash and PRO ~900 word. All optimization ON. 

[bunion]

OK downloaded 9.7 andwill make it fully registered WITHOUT needing any licence or reg files..gimmee a day asi got pulsonix to do too

bunion

[ALLPIC]

Great ...

Waiting for that.

[bunion]

Manuel said he tested it and told me no point in cracking it as its too buggy and compiles code strangely

i cracked it and asked him to compile using 45 day eval to compare results with my fixed version and they were same but crappy compared to there single versions 9.65's

bunion

[alien]

yes bunion this particular version is piece of crap....as I said earlier...htsoft says that this version uses  a totally new generation of there so called "omniscent code genrator"but it seems instead of having done some huge improvements they have messed up the whole thing.....I think they overengineered it

[DrSurfer]

hi all.... as far as I know "omniscient code generation" is not a "just added" feature but it's available from some time... for sure it's here from 9.60 release, if not earlier...
I found that 9.65PL1 broke my code, so I am stuck using 9.65PL0.
Nevertheless, I would like to give a try to 9.70 ...

[mitsos]

hi

bunion are you release the patch for the last version (9.70)?

regards
mitsos

[tavioman]

I use PICC 9.60PL5 and and PICC18 9.63PL3 and I have no problems. Do somebody knows some issues with these versions and needs to update to the "latest" one?
Thank you!

[GeneralMadDog]

Hi bunion,

Thank you for your works. I'm using Win7 Ultimate 64 bit. I installed MPLAB 8.40 first. And then installed PIC18_PRO_963PL3 by using your instructions (serial number indicated and off-line activation). Before reg file, I changed installation folder in it and applied it. I patched 2 exe files exactly like you mentioned with your patcher (33 bytes patched succesffuly for both). But the compiler still says it is in lite mode. I uninstalled hitech picc18 pro, delete reg keys and re-install, but the result doesn't change. For the third time, I installed it in demo mode (45 days), and applied your patch. Now it says the compiler is in demo mode but will expire on 2029. Is it normal?

Thanks.

Hi!

I have the same effect on Win7 x64:

If I install the full version with serial #, I get the messages (after patching):
dsPIC 9.60PL3: compiler is not activated
PIC pro 9.65PL1 release candidate: lite mode

If I install both compilers in demo-mode (after patching):
dsPIC 9.60PL3: no special message
PIC pro 9.65PL1 release candidate: this licence will expire on Wed, 12 Dec 2029

Regards,
MadDog

[bunion]

yes maddog normal...heres the story

up until latest dspic 96pl3 id been using a vaild 45 day license key to crack all the compilers...what the crack allowed was for that valid key generated for my pc to run on ANY other pc and also to extend the period to 2029 ...i did not think choosing to install as full or demo made much diff so told u all to install as full ..maybe demo is best bet for win 7 now..

ALSO im noticing very slight changes to there code which was messing with universal patcher so when i done the new patch for latest dspic i used a completely diff crack method which bypasses needing to have a licence key altogether...only thing needed in regfile is a serial=HCDSPIC-53118 so it shows something  in main window..the ACTIVATION key is completely phoney using any numbers whatsoever and the reason why u dont get any expiry data etc is because i now completely bypass date checking routine too...it compiles ok and runs normally so from mow on thats the way the others will be done also...and no uni patcher from now on itll be individual crack versions

about picc 9.70...attach a test peice of code that you can successfully compile using the 45 day evaluation along with the results you get....attach the .asm file too...using mplab...if ur happy with those results compared to older picc version then ill create crack for it BUT i already cracked it and code looked to long and not as good as last picc version but manuel gets same results using legit version so he said 9.70 is a waste of time to release crack for till they fix it

bunion

[DrSurfer]

Dear friends, this thread on htsoft forum should clarify about 9.70 pro "performance issues"...

hxxp://forum.htsoft.com/all/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/132662/an//page//vc/1

BTW my problem with 9.65PL1 is this error message:

HI-TECH C PRO for the PIC10/12/16 MCU family  V9.65PL1
Copyright (C) 1984-2009 HI-TECH SOFTWARE
Serial number: HCPICP-36668
this licence will expire on Wed, 12 Dec 2029
Error   [468] DisplayLCD.obj; 170. undefined symbol "_sprintf" in FNCALL record

if I use the 9.65PL0 compiler compilation is successful.

The sprintf call occurs in a source different from the one that contains main() function.
The error disappears if I put a fake call to sprintf [for example sprintf(buf,"");] in the body of the main function.
I hate this kind of workarounds.

DrS.

[robban]

If You think expiry date 2029 is too late, You can dismiss further inquiries abt. HI-TECH. Myself, it's quite enough...

[pirvcb]

Maybe, part of attention on 9.70 hi-tech release, is motivated by flowcode compatibility. In 4.2 version of flowcode, matrixmultimedia declared its compatibility with hi-tech C 9.70 and explain how to use this compiler from inside flowcode 4.2 application. So, i guess, this would be a motivation for someone to wish 9.70 cracked. Just a supposition....
http://www.matrixmultimedia.com/mmforums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=6812

[DrSurfer]

The only sure thing is that nobody wants updated cracks just to defeat the 2029 "limit".

Is it possible to install "side by side" different versions of hitech compiler? In crack's infos is always stated that every previous version must be removed before install another one.
I didn't try it, and I wonder if this is only a bit... paranoid or it's a real issue.
Having different versions on the same machine could help to choose and understand if many "improvements" are for real or are only marketing claims.

[oldvan]

Is it possible to install "side by side" different versions of hitech compiler? ...
Having different versions on the same machine could help to choose and
understand if many "improvements" are for real or are only marketing claims.

If you can't do it on one computer, you could use VMWare and clone a
virtual machine, then install the versions of the cmmpiler you wish to
compare on these identical virtual machines.

I'm sure others here would love to hear what you learn!

[bunion]

Thats cool if it can be used with flowcode

If someone attaches a test bit of code i can run in 9.70 and also the results youll get when its compled correctly then ill create new crack with no expiry

bunion

[DrSurfer]

I don't understand your request: a different compiler could generate totally different binary code given the same source code.
I could send you a complete MPLAB/hitech project, that compiles with 9.65 and works (as far as my own bugs allows! ), but without the actual board what kind of testing could you perform?

Anyway if you think that my code could be useful, I will send you my project, complete of any generated output.
I'm afraid that it's much more than a "test bit of code"...

DrS

[ALLPIC]

bunion

Please find source code and hex file all attached for PICC9.65pl1 and picc9.70

PICC9.70 45 days demo shows 24%

picc9.65pl1 shows 19%

if some one can see output and suggess the reson?


Posted on: December 13, 2009, 06:26:02 18:26 - Automerged
sorry Both are working ok no problems on hardware

[bunion]

thats y i never released crack b4 as 9.70 code is bigger than 9.65's...but ill go ahead and test allpics code in crack ..if it gives same then ill release

bunion

im getting 18.9%

taking dog walk then ill up for testing

[DrSurfer]

I'm very anxious to read about your test: the 9.70 when registered as "time limited demo" (and in Lite mode) is known to generate bigger code.
It's not known if this is a wanted behavior. 

I have the suspect that this is a way to avoid the cracking by extending the demo period beyond the 45 days, because the time limited demo cracked with this tecnique will generate the same "inflated" code of the Lite version.

A little unfair for those that want genuinely evaluate the compiler, IMHO.