The v5.117 release looks like the usual... fix one problem and bury it in a bunch of minor changes. lol From their newsletter:
Recent changes include:
5.117 IDE COMPILER > CLEAN function now deletes .hex files. .ccspjt files are are NOT deleted
5.117 Improved RTOS error message added when a task is not defined.
5.117 Updated Debugger not showing RAM for parts with more than 64K RAM.
5.117 Fixed the USE RS232 receive_buffer= option when used with over 4K RAM.
5.117 Fixed spi_read() function to properly wait on newer PIC 18 devices when a parameter is passed to it to clock out.
5.117 Updated i2c_slaveaddr() function to update all slave address registers for newer PIC18 devices.
5.117 #pin_select now accepts PORTF pins on the dsPIC33CK1024MP710 family.
5.117 All CN pins are now available for PIC24FJ64GB106, PIC24FJ64GB108 and PIC24FJ64GB110 devices.
5.117 Updated PCD Wizard TCP/IP to fix an issue with displaying web pages on some parts.
New: PIC16F17154
New: PIC16F17155
New: PIC16F17156
New: PIC16F17174
New: PIC16F17175
New: PIC16F17176
New: PIC16F18154
New: PIC16F18155
New: PIC16F18156
New: PIC16F18174
New: PIC16F18175
New: PIC16F18176
Updated: PIC24FJ64GB106
Updated: PIC24FJ64GB108
Updated: PIC24FJ64GB110
21
on: May 03, 2024, 05:56:33 05:56
|
||
Started by nullos - Last post by jellybean442 | ||
22
on: May 02, 2024, 01:29:11 13:29
|
||
Started by Manuel - Last post by pickit2 | ||
I entered in a forum topic even if not logged in, does is it allowed ? Yes there are open boards (topics) that's why we have requests not to post in open topics, but to use text option. take care, X! |
23
Others / Testing Forum / Re: Proteus rubbish way of reporting error - no details member 15 years WTF
on: April 29, 2024, 07:35:33 19:35
|
||
Started by conanmayer - Last post by Wilksey | ||
24
on: April 29, 2024, 08:47:32 08:47
|
||
Started by conanmayer - Last post by conanmayer | ||
8.17sp2: I can't import any image to schematic capture (File > Import Image). I tried bmp, png, gif, multicolor, black&white, nothing work. Please test it anyone. Thx.
|
25
on: April 27, 2024, 10:25:50 10:25
|
||
Started by Wizpic - Last post by sphinx | ||
using a voltage calculator i get 1889.524kohms
Posted on: 2024-04-27, 10:40:59 - Automerged you can allways lower the 11kohms to get some othe value depending on the values one can get and how exact you want it to be the more bits you use the more noice you will have as well 2^16 will give you 1.5mV resolution and that can get noisy this needs to be calculated for as well |
26
on: April 27, 2024, 10:07:47 10:07
|
||
Started by Wizpic - Last post by Wizpic | ||
This is the schematic for it.
If I'm correct and if I do the calculations with the 11k and 680k resistor values on the input I would get +/- 573Mv so for 99V then the 680K would need to be 2M ? |
27
on: April 27, 2024, 09:32:46 09:32
|
||
Started by Wizpic - Last post by sphinx | ||
if you dont have the schematics it might get trickier to find the the voltage divider where youu could change the range of the input voltage but i would think it is possible to modify,
unless its potted with some gunk inside or components are wiped of identification numbers if it is high impedance input you could allwayes make an external voltage divider |
28
on: April 27, 2024, 08:41:16 08:41
|
||
Started by Wizpic - Last post by Wizpic | ||
Just a quick question it says that the m5stack voltmeter can measure up to +/-36v
I was just wondering would it be possible to modify it so that it can measure +/-99v absolute voltage ? Here is the unit I’m talking about https://thepihut.com/products/voltmeter-unit-ads1115?variant=40639062212803¤cy=GBP&utm_medium=product_sync&utm_source=google&utm_content=sag_organic&utm_campaign=sag_organic&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjwxLKxBhA7EiwAXO0R0AMRAb8CxLa1cHosetK2a7DsY-WmK3wBwx6ZPV-xsVZqoaTx7aTAXhoC0uYQAvD_BwE |
29
on: April 25, 2024, 10:17:12 10:17
|
||
Started by Sideshow Bob - Last post by OscarH | ||
To what I remember, and Wiki confirms that, there are differing conventions concerning the unary operation '−' (usually pronounced "minus").
In written or printed mathematics, the expression −3² is interpreted to mean −(3²) = −9 Now, it appears some programming languages consider the 'minus' sign is part of the number, thus taking the square of this number is always a positive number... IMO, the question is there only to highlight the risk of misunderstanding in between people, and in any case, it would had been better to add parenthesis i.e. (-3)² or -(3²). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations |
30
on: April 25, 2024, 07:50:46 07:50
|
||
Started by Sideshow Bob - Last post by Vineyards | ||
I am not a mathematician, but we need to consider mathematics as a set of methods agreed upon by people to ease certain aspects of quantifying objects, understanding their magnitudes, etc. Several number types are used, and negative numbers are not considered natural. They were historically needed to demonstrate, for example, the balance of accounts between entities or persons. Bookkeeping runs around a set of agreed-upon rules, and whatever is represented here doesn't have to make sense, it is just how you regard it. There are many more methods where having both positive and negative numbers help people keep track of things.
|