|
inkwaterman
Guest
|
 |
« on: June 15, 2007, 06:56:59 18:56 » |
|
Hi !
I'm writing to you for ask some questions about the CCS Compiler.
I use the CCS for work, and recently I passed to the Version 4.038.
Unfortunately I have found many and many bugs , and I am thinking seriously to change the compiler, or at least change the version...
For you experience, What's the most reliable version of CCS compiler ?
Is the Hitec C compiler more reliable than the CCS compiler ?
Have you some advices to give about the compiler ?
Thanks
Best regards
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
planet69
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2007, 01:50:54 01:50 » |
|
I compiling my project using PCWH 4.038 via MPLAB 7.50
The problem is after a few sessions of compiling, the MPLAB window closes automatically.
Does anyone here face the same problem? More importantly does anyone here knows what's wrong?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cerebronico
Junior Member
 Offline
Posts: 76
Thank You
-Given: 262
-Receive: 27
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2007, 02:02:30 02:02 » |
|
yeah! CCS is like a wild horse, you must tame it before you ride, but i think it's only the IDE, that's why i prefer to use ultraedit32 as the IDE since it is totally customizable and has a very useful autocomplete feature
Anyway I'm wondering if there is a better compiler (somebody has used Source Boost C compiler?)
Greetings
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
inkwaterman
Guest
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2007, 08:53:03 08:53 » |
|
I used the CCS 4.038 for a PIC 18F2523 based project, and I had many problem with memory pointer.
But if I compile the code for the PICF2680 the same code works right !
I have search in to the CCS forum and in to the CCS documentation about this behavior but I didn't found anything...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
micropar
Active Member
Offline
Posts: 173
Thank You
-Given: 44
-Receive: 13
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2007, 01:35:24 13:35 » |
|
Hi inkwaterman and Cerebronico, Please refer to my all reply here in this topic: http://www.sonsivri.com/forum/index.php?topic=2926.0I hope you may find correct answer to your questions. Regards, --micropar-- |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hate
Hero Member
 Warned
Offline
Posts: 555
Thank You
-Given: 156
-Receive: 355
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2007, 09:39:53 21:39 » |
|
You can also refer to my replies in the topic 'micropar' referred.  Regards... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards...
|
|
|
FriskyFerret
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 560
Thank You
-Given: 513
-Receive: 360
Put it in, take it out.
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2007, 03:34:34 03:34 » |
|
Use CCS v3.249. I've used it extensively and can say it is a very stable, useful compiler. The one I prefer above the rest.
I have the hardware debugger from CCS as well and it works nicely with the v3.249 compiler. The hardware debugger is a real bargan at $80 US.
I was expecting the v4 product to be more stable by now. Perhaps we'll have to wait until '08.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Dancing pants and leotards, that's what I'm talkin' about!
|
|
|
|
prosoft
Guest
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 30, 2007, 11:26:37 11:26 » |
|
I think, that now for work with PIC16+MPLAB7.50 version PCWH 4.013 is the best choice.
Thanks
Best regards
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hate
Hero Member
Warned
Offline
Posts: 555
Thank You
-Given: 156
-Receive: 355
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 30, 2007, 12:33:56 12:33 » |
|
Use the latest version 4.038 I think not 4.013!
Regards...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Regards...
|
|
|
|
