Sonsivri
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 11:50:07 11:50


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Print
Author Topic: CCS, HI-TechC, MikroC , MPLAB C.....Which C Compiler is the BEST???  (Read 75594 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
bluex
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 83

Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 39


« Reply #25 on: September 05, 2007, 09:10:25 09:10 »

I agree with the fact that HITEC does very good and very nice C compilers. They do only C compilers and they do them very well.
But compared to C18, Hitec compiler is
- very Expensive,
- and has no libraries (C18 has LCD/I2C/SPI/MW/OW/..../SOFT I2C/SOFT SPI/...) for hardware management Sad

Regards
Bluex
Logged
cae
Guest
« Reply #26 on: September 05, 2007, 10:10:03 10:10 »

I have used CCS, HI-Tech, MikroC and MicroChip C, and I find they all have their good and bad points.
In the end I think it all comes down to the individual using it, and sometimes the code they are working on as to which is the best.
Logged
ze_tr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17

Thank You
-Given: 4
-Receive: 3


« Reply #27 on: September 06, 2007, 07:05:28 07:05 »

The best compiler is ccs c compiler if you want flexible c codes (buil-in functions, by using stream multiple serial ports, hw/sw i2c,...), on the other side there is no guaranty that current bugs will be fixed in the next version, or new bugs will not be introduced while fixing the existing bugs or adding new features to the compiler.

One of the best solution may be to modify the opensource driver codes for all compiler version, and use them with any compiler you like.

At the moment I am using CCS C Compiler and if spare some time I will try to use C18 and move to C18 permanently.
Logged
mmladenovic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 18

Thank You
-Given: 3
-Receive: 3


« Reply #28 on: September 06, 2007, 07:46:54 07:46 »

HI,
C18 is the best compiler.

Best regards
Milan 
Logged
jimbies
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 54

Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 72


« Reply #29 on: September 06, 2007, 03:20:32 15:20 »

Hi,

I agree with mmladenovic. MPLAB C18/C30 is the best, especially if you
are using ICD2.
Logged
trocse
Guest
« Reply #30 on: September 07, 2007, 11:31:15 11:31 »

Ok C18 is good. what can be use if you want to write code for pic12 , pic16 ,pic24 series.must we buy and learn another compiler for all series which same producer mcu's? ha?  Huh Roll Eyes
Logged
bluex
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 83

Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 39


« Reply #31 on: September 07, 2007, 02:47:10 14:47 »

Ok C18 is good. what can be use if you want to write code for pic12 , pic16 ,pic24 series.must we buy and learn another compiler for all series which same producer mcu's? ha?  Huh Roll Eyes

1- I prefer to pass time to learn another compiler instead of using a buggy one
2- Why stick with 12 and 16xx series when 18Fxx series is cheaper and by far better  (more ram, more rom, more speed, better architecture, same pinout).

Regards
Logged
AntiBG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8

Thank You
-Given: 75
-Receive: 2


« Reply #32 on: September 08, 2007, 07:30:50 07:30 »

MikroC, 100% recommend.... The Best
Logged
kriang
Guest
« Reply #33 on: September 12, 2007, 03:59:20 15:59 »

Yes, I started with CCS , I feel it easy and faster (small code) because i don't expert in C. I will try for Hitech with big code. that is mind.  Cheesy
Logged
jivega
Guest
« Reply #34 on: September 30, 2007, 06:36:16 06:36 »

Hi-TechC is for me, the best compiler. Not include functions and drivers, but the code is highly optimized in size of final HEX file.
Logged
Robi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20

Thank You
-Given: 54
-Receive: 1


« Reply #35 on: September 30, 2007, 11:24:16 11:24 »

1- I prefer to pass time to learn another compiler instead of using a buggy one
Its up to you.

2- Why stick with 12 and 16xx series when 18Fxx series is cheaper and by far better  (more ram, more rom, more speed, better architecture, same pinout).
Why don't you address such a question to Microchip ? To me, the small the application the smallest the controller. Did you ever see 18Fxx in 6 or 8-pin version ?   
Logged
bluex
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 83

Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 39


« Reply #36 on: October 01, 2007, 10:02:16 10:02 »

To me, the small the application the smallest the controller. Did you ever see 18Fxx in 6 or 8-pin version ?   


How many 8 pin 10Fxxx series can you seriously program using a HLL such as CCS Huh these pics are done only for ASM programming. Even if you use CCS for doing a button debounce, u can do that with ASM in some few lines of asm...
Logged
sonsivritwchen
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 37

Thank You
-Given: 18
-Receive: 15


« Reply #37 on: October 21, 2007, 03:48:19 15:48 »

I like the int24 math in CC5x and bytecraft mpc compilers. But they are not very attractive for the user interface and device wizard.
Logged
quark576
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19

Thank You
-Given: 13
-Receive: 13


« Reply #38 on: October 21, 2007, 05:24:53 17:24 »

I use CCS sometimes and I consider good and reliable.
Logged
charnyutk
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32

Thank You
-Given: 7
-Receive: 5


« Reply #39 on: October 23, 2007, 05:23:00 05:23 »

All of them was excellence,but I was used c30 for a long time.^^
Logged
Binary9Gbit
Guest
« Reply #40 on: October 30, 2007, 01:47:24 01:47 »

 Wink ccs very good
Logged
kcid
Guest
« Reply #41 on: October 30, 2007, 03:49:12 15:49 »

I think, all compilers are good, but CCS have many interesting tools that make the best...
Logged
picfan
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61

Thank You
-Given: 682
-Receive: 313


« Reply #42 on: October 31, 2007, 12:23:33 12:23 »

I am newbie, HI-TechC is too hard for me. I use CCS.
Picfan
Logged
iso
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12

Thank You
-Given: 14
-Receive: 1


« Reply #43 on: November 01, 2007, 04:00:06 16:00 »

i m using ccs by years.i made a lot of commercial  project (big and small) with ccs picc . Sometimes i tried to use other compilers,(hi-tech, microchip ,iar ,fored wizc, microelectronica etc..) but i never realized a small project all of these compilers.i had a problem every trying and i returned to ccsc.why?any idea for this stuations. Huh Sad
Logged
jamen
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 41

Thank You
-Given: 31
-Receive: 7


« Reply #44 on: December 08, 2007, 01:16:31 01:16 »

;)HITECH
PICC18-PRO V9.61, this is more power!.

HI: friend .can you upload the download link .include path file.thank you.
Logged
sonsivritwchen
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 37

Thank You
-Given: 18
-Receive: 15


« Reply #45 on: December 08, 2007, 12:30:56 12:30 »

The merit of CCS is its abundant function for doing simple projects. But the worst part in CCS is the ambiguities in the documentation, when a user try to program some thing not in common place.
Logged
piscopatos
Guest
« Reply #46 on: December 08, 2007, 03:24:45 15:24 »

hi-tech or ccs or others are not the programs just 2 ppl sit down wrote thm,thr are big thy are huge. so i dont think it is a good idea to discuss which is best. with ccs and hi-tech it is like talkin about same thing in 2 different ways.my recomendation is to start with one of thm and stick with it, and whn u become a pro on one of those u wont have major problems with writin a code with another c program.
Logged
Halcon67
Newbie
*
 Warned
Offline Offline

Posts: 9

Thank You
-Given: 211
-Receive: 51


« Reply #47 on: December 12, 2007, 12:45:27 12:45 »

I experiment with MikroC and think that is good for hobby use. Hi-TechC is complicated for me.
Logged
Orcino Borges
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23

Thank You
-Given: 13
-Receive: 18


« Reply #48 on: December 12, 2007, 08:55:51 20:55 »

 I use a CCS , but i a learning a C18 this is a ANSI

                           Orcino
Logged
mr_sri
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 17

Thank You
-Given: 47
-Receive: 3


« Reply #49 on: December 13, 2007, 06:14:21 06:14 »

I like CCS, because a lot of library and example, so we can use it easily. For compiler comparation,  you can see this link...
http://www.ccsinfo.com/content.php?page=newcompilercomp
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
Print
Jump to:  


DISCLAIMER
WE DONT HOST ANY ILLEGAL FILES ON THE SERVER
USE CONTACT US TO REPORT ILLEGAL FILES
ADMINISTRATORS CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR USERS POSTS AND LINKS

... Copyright © 2003-2999 Sonsivri.to ...
Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | HarzeM Dilber MC