Sonsivri
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 06:41:45 06:41


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]
Print
Author Topic: TPS563200 PCB  (Read 3852 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« on: October 10, 2020, 10:52:17 10:52 »

I did this PCB in KiCAD, I am not sure if it can be improved, any thoughts?
The constraints implied by the PCB shape and those in the datasheet made it really difficult to accomplish better work, may be someone else can make it better..
Logged
Old_but_Alive
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329

Thank You
-Given: 702
-Receive: 118


« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2020, 11:01:31 11:01 »

This must be a new chip 'cos Mouser wont have them until January 2021
Logged

I fought Ohm's Law ...  and the law won
I only use Mosfets because I have a Bipolar mental disorder :-)
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2020, 12:13:56 12:13 »

I will order TPS563200, in case I got them before mouser does, I will send you the PCB and the chip, you have to pay for the shipping Cheesy

I have ordered some parts from farnell 3 weeks ago, they are in Dubai now, shame I didn't see this IC earlier..

Any way, we still have to make this PCB better!
Logged
Old_but_Alive
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329

Thank You
-Given: 702
-Receive: 118


« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2020, 01:22:35 13:22 »

happy to pay, I havent worked since Dec 2019, due to COVID, so my brain needs some excercise
I will get back to you on my thoughts on the layout
« Last Edit: October 10, 2020, 04:55:33 16:55 by Old_but_Alive » Logged

I fought Ohm's Law ...  and the law won
I only use Mosfets because I have a Bipolar mental disorder :-)
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2020, 02:33:50 14:33 »

Did minor mods, added correct footprint for L1.
Logged
Sideshow Bob
Cracking Team
Hero Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 982

Thank You
-Given: 230
-Receive: 960



« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2020, 03:46:57 15:46 »

I see the eval board has taken a slightly different design route. You can take a look at it and maybe use some details. I have not used this IC my self, and do not know it at all
https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/slvuaa3/slvuaa3.pdf?ts=1602340881899
Logged

I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass... and I'm all out of bubblegum
Old_but_Alive
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 329

Thank You
-Given: 702
-Receive: 118


« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2020, 04:58:26 16:58 »

the inductor seem a long way away from the IC, probably the output capacitor also
Logged

I fought Ohm's Law ...  and the law won
I only use Mosfets because I have a Bipolar mental disorder :-)
Wilksey
Cracking Team
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 405

Thank You
-Given: 158
-Receive: 2543


« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2020, 05:43:14 17:43 »

I'll presume it's a SMPS IC, i've not looked at the design but I usually use a few "rules".
If you can ensure a solid plane, and if necessary use plenty of vias.
Keep output "switching" components as close to the IC as possible, you don't want that noise going all over the place.
In most cases the output path is the important one, inductor, capacitor, bootstrap cap, keep these as tight as you can, worry about the other bits later.

I am not saying my way is the absolute 100% best way but as a rule of thumb I have had 100% success rate with these considerations.  I have a few SMPS on 2 layer board, but the bottom is purely GND and the top is GND poured and stitched where practical, I will go to 4+ layers if the design calls for it, most can be done on 2 layer though.
Logged
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2020, 06:06:24 18:06 »

I see, look at this, I think this one is much more improved.
Logged
cesare
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 20

Thank You
-Given: 8
-Receive: 25


« Reply #9 on: October 10, 2020, 07:57:37 19:57 »

Hi all,

the routing rules for a step down DC/DC converter are few and simple.

you must minimize 2 loops :

1) the loop that comprise input capacitor, high side switch, inductor and output capacitor.

2) the loop taht comprise the low side switch (or the freeweling diode), the inductor and the output capacitor.

The first loop is less critical because the circulating current is triangular. The second loop is more critical because the circulating current is trapezoidal and contains discontinuities.

In few words : both the input and output capacitors should return to the power ground of the controller (or the freeweling diode)on the top layer with a wide trace.

Another suggestion is to keep analog ground (for example the return of the feedback network) separated from power ground and connect it to power gnd at a single point (star ground)

Regards



Logged
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« Reply #10 on: October 12, 2020, 07:27:49 19:27 »

Here is the latest version, as per recommendations above, I looked at the EVAL PCB, my design distances are far smaller than the EVAL one!
« Last Edit: October 12, 2020, 07:33:28 19:33 by metal » Logged
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2020, 06:56:25 18:56 »

Here is the latest version, real major changes/improvements, can also be used up to 5A with TPS565201, but you might need to change the inductor footprint:

- Making the VFB a lot shorter, taking the net directly from the VOUT pin
- two layer design instead of 4-layer
- added closer capacitor to VIN and VOUT
- Using keepout areas trying to craft how current flows through filled zones

can be also used with TPS565201 and other chips similar to TPS563200, I will not list them here, you can go to webench and see all possible/compatible ICs..
Logged
TucoRamirez
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 307

Thank You
-Given: 257
-Receive: 115


Tuco ... dead or Alive


« Reply #12 on: October 16, 2020, 09:34:00 09:34 »

silly question, how to choose the via diameter/distance to use for those tracks?  any thumbrule or you take the default settings? (i'm doing a sepic MCP1661T design but i don't really know how to do a proper via stitch adapted to that (also if a ground stitching is ok or is too much).
Logged

Whoever double crosses me and leaves me alive... he understands nothing about Tuco.
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2020, 04:26:38 16:26 »

if silly, why ask then?

Posted on: October 16, 2020, 06:01:05 18:01 - Automerged

Look at saturn PCB toolkit
Logged
sphinx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 913

Thank You
-Given: 606
-Receive: 265



« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2020, 10:22:22 22:22 »

I am sharing a generic design for tps562200 and tps563200 please read info in shematic sheet no production files, gerbers are created.
Add mounting holes or change design for your own liking.

please check IC / all of  the design for any errors.

ii did not want to hijack the thread made by metal.

link in atachment
Logged

laws of physics are not laws at all, just assumptions and formulas that work as long as we don't figure something new that wrecks the calculations. the infinite onion try to peel that one
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2420

Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678


Top Topic Starter


« Reply #15 on: October 16, 2020, 10:42:10 22:42 »

my aim was to get sth like OKI-78SR, feel free to post in the same thread.
Logged
sphinx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 913

Thank You
-Given: 606
-Receive: 265



« Reply #16 on: October 16, 2020, 10:44:24 22:44 »

if you want you can move this to your thread.

i had a look at that circuit one can easily change my design to 3 pin connector if wanted.
« Last Edit: October 16, 2020, 10:48:51 22:48 by sphinx » Logged

laws of physics are not laws at all, just assumptions and formulas that work as long as we don't figure something new that wrecks the calculations. the infinite onion try to peel that one
sphinx
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 913

Thank You
-Given: 606
-Receive: 265



« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2020, 10:51:05 22:51 »

I am sharing a modified version of my generic design for tps562200 and tps563200 with a 3 pin connector. please read info in shematic sheet no production files, gerbers are created.

Add mounting holes or change design for your own liking.

please check IC / all of  the design for any errors.

link in atachment

I have not checked if this version is able to handle 3A on the pins, with the widths on the tracks it should be to do it according to saturn pcb toolkit.

P.S. i forgot to mention that calcultaions for amperage was done with 2oz copper in mind.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2020, 03:32:09 03:32 by sphinx » Logged

laws of physics are not laws at all, just assumptions and formulas that work as long as we don't figure something new that wrecks the calculations. the infinite onion try to peel that one
Pages: [1]
Print
Jump to:  


DISCLAIMER
WE DONT HOST ANY ILLEGAL FILES ON THE SERVER
USE CONTACT US TO REPORT ILLEGAL FILES
ADMINISTRATORS CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR USERS POSTS AND LINKS

... Copyright © 2003-2999 Sonsivri.to ...
Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | HarzeM Dilber MC