Sonsivri
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 20, 2024, 05:37:01 05:37


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7
Print
Author Topic: Which Pic C compiler do you like?  (Read 29148 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
jim_17
Guest
« Reply #100 on: February 29, 2008, 03:29:56 15:29 »

I use ccs, I think is the best one, because most people use it, and there are many information on the net.
Logged
mrwinch
Guest
« Reply #101 on: March 02, 2008, 11:48:24 11:48 »

I love mikroC for pic and dspic: in my opinion it's a perfect and fast delivery solution, in particular with mikroe development board
Logged
mobeb
Guest
« Reply #102 on: March 05, 2008, 07:32:31 07:32 »

I am using ccs C compiler, becase of very simple and effective. Also code optimization is better than other compilers
Logged
startt
Guest
« Reply #103 on: March 05, 2008, 03:09:33 15:09 »

Hitech PIC C,I like it
Logged
leo777
Guest
« Reply #104 on: March 06, 2008, 09:15:04 21:15 »

I'm using CCS PicC compiler
Logged
petarp
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 68

Thank You
-Given: 26
-Receive: 51


« Reply #105 on: March 10, 2008, 03:03:13 15:03 »

I like CCS compiler, it's very easy to use.
Logged
wATAw
Guest
« Reply #106 on: March 11, 2008, 09:45:36 21:45 »

I use ccs, because is easy. But i think you dont learn much with it....
Logged
pak
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61

Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 17


« Reply #107 on: March 13, 2008, 09:50:09 09:50 »

Hi friends,
     I used Hi Tech, CCS and PICBasic compilers in my hobby projects. I find that all compilers have adv and disadv. In Basic compilers, you have to use their pre-defined codes, such as LCDIN, HSERIN and you have to familiar with codes before using them.
     In C compiler, you can change their pre-defined code such as lcd.c.
     If you use CCS, it is easier to understand and use. It has great built-in functions like delayms, printf, especially delay function is always use in any microcontroller source code. CCS made delay function accurated over any crystal frequency. Unfortunately, Hi Tech does not have very good delay function. CCS made a lot of build-in function to attract customers like students and hobbists.
      In my opinion, try not to use built-in fucntions of CCS unless you tested the function and understand very well. You can check the function with asm file that is generated by CCS compiler.

Hope it will help,

pak
Logged
nvicchi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15

Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 7


« Reply #108 on: March 30, 2008, 09:44:50 09:44 »

I use C18 for 18F, CCS for 16F (simply because C18 cant be used for those uC).
I recommend you not to use the built-in functions from any compiler. They usually are very generic (thus, making bigger ans slower code), and compromise portability.
For ex, if you need to set up a timer, dont use a "set_up_timer" function, just set it up!!!
Also, to keep compatibility to it's top, use headers with definition for each compiler.
For ex, in C18 you use PORTBbit.RB0 to access RB0, and in CCS you use #byte PORTB = 0x006 and #bit PORTB0 = PORTB.0
If you keep 2 headers, one for each compiler, where you define (for C18) #define RB0 PORTBbits.RB0 and (for CCS) #byte PORTB = 0x006, #bit PORTB0 = PORTB.0, #define RB0 PORTB.0, and use through all the code "RB0", all you have to do to move from one compiler to another is to change the header you use.

Regards,
Beto
Logged
ninjammx
Inactive

Offline Offline

Posts: 6

Thank You
-Given: 6
-Receive: 0


« Reply #109 on: March 30, 2008, 10:44:32 22:44 »

Hi, I'am use CCS for 16FXXX. It quite simple.
anyone, Can share about HT-PICC ?
What is it strong point?
Logged
mcnscott
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8

Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 0


« Reply #110 on: March 31, 2008, 03:03:12 03:03 »

I learned with CCS doing a project from rentron talking time and temp clock.  However, for ease of use I've found C18 the easiest to experiment with.  I'm just starting with C30 though, Hi-Tech claims to be fully ANSI compliant, so I may drift over there.
Logged
mikepic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 23

Thank You
-Given: 18
-Receive: 8


« Reply #111 on: April 02, 2008, 08:18:42 08:18 »

Althoug is true that it has excessive version rotation, I prefer the CCS because the amount of information in the internet and the ease of use.
The best of this compiler is the great driver library included for I.C.'s like PIC's, EEPROMS, sensors and so on
Logged
lead_inovation
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 37

Thank You
-Given: 85
-Receive: 3


« Reply #112 on: April 02, 2008, 02:34:53 14:34 »

i'm using C30,C32. because:
      1)it's full library for peripheral dspic and Pic32.
      2) it's ANSI C.
      3) it's (free with student edition). and free IDE (MPLAB IDE)
Logged
cooperharris
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 90

Thank You
-Given: 72
-Receive: 22


« Reply #113 on: April 02, 2008, 03:09:27 15:09 »

I think  that one of  the  best ones   is ccs,because  is very complete, and there  is  a lot of information in the web in case  you get lost
Logged
m3ni4k
Guest
« Reply #114 on: April 04, 2008, 04:45:49 04:45 »

Microchip PIC C compiler.. it is very useful
Logged
mirkatmir
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12

Thank You
-Given: 64
-Receive: 28


« Reply #115 on: April 04, 2008, 06:50:36 06:50 »

I'm just starting with PIC now, and I use a MikroC compiler. It is good for me.
Logged
Angor
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7

Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 0


« Reply #116 on: April 09, 2008, 07:57:34 19:57 »

I'm using CCS C and MPLAB IDE with ICD2
Logged
cjq_sh
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11

Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 1


« Reply #117 on: April 12, 2008, 05:03:57 17:03 »

I am using HI-TECH compilers
Logged
cooperharris
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 90

Thank You
-Given: 72
-Receive: 22


« Reply #118 on: April 12, 2008, 05:23:25 17:23 »

I am   using   ccs compiler and  is  pretty cool!
Logged
eemkutay
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149

Thank You
-Given: 21
-Receive: 220


Knowledge is Power


« Reply #119 on: April 12, 2008, 11:10:35 23:10 »

Hi-tech is the best.
Logged
Kloswiski
Guest
« Reply #120 on: April 13, 2008, 04:28:28 04:28 »

I prefer CCS c compiler. it's simpler and has good rich source of library of functions. try it.
Logged
engaddar
Guest
« Reply #121 on: April 13, 2008, 09:37:50 21:37 »

picc compiler is the one.
Logged
ferbusi
Guest
« Reply #122 on: April 17, 2008, 10:14:23 22:14 »

the ccs have the best libraries, but c18 is of microchip and this is important
Logged
fire_rayo
Guest
« Reply #123 on: April 17, 2008, 10:15:32 22:15 »

CCS C
Logged
nullos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8

Thank You
-Given: 24
-Receive: 3


« Reply #124 on: April 17, 2008, 10:41:11 22:41 »

i want to test Hitech but i see it's harder than CCS
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7
Print
Jump to:  


DISCLAIMER
WE DONT HOST ANY ILLEGAL FILES ON THE SERVER
USE CONTACT US TO REPORT ILLEGAL FILES
ADMINISTRATORS CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR USERS POSTS AND LINKS

... Copyright © 2003-2999 Sonsivri.to ...
Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | HarzeM Dilber MC