mizk_electro
Cracking Team
Active Member
    Muted
Offline
Posts: 133
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« on: June 23, 2006, 08:22:47 08:22 » |
|
Hi guys,
I just newbie in electronic hobby even I have interest in this hobby for a long time ago.
Just to ask opinin (pro & cont) & way ... how to transfer PCB layout to copper board.
For now, I'm using tonner transfer (using laser printer & coated paper) ... result: not so good & photoresist board ... result : very good but the board are very expensive.
Anyone using graving machine to make a PCB board ?
Thanks for info.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mizk_electro
Cracking Team
Active Member
    Muted
Offline
Posts: 133
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2006, 01:47:25 13:47 » |
|
Thanks Dax,
Currently I'm doing it (toner transfer) using 2 type of paper (that available in Malaysia which I know & tried)
1. Canon Glossy Photo paper ... GP-401 ... A4 190g/m2
Result : very good ... no cutting line & no spread line.... can push the iron as much as you much
Problem: When take the paper from copper board, there is wax on the PCB especially in pad's pin hole and so hard to remove it even using tooth brush, I still need to check if it still there... so then no hold in pad as for guide the drill as a starter.
2. HP Photo laser paper ... A4 120g/m2
Result : not so good as the line (toner) being cut at a few place (the toner fell off with the paper). Cannot push it (using iron) too hard, it will spread the toner and it will short circuit the PCB track.
Good thing : No wax remain in the pad's hole ... so the acid will etch the pad and make the hole as drill starter guide.
Repair : Using lumocolour pen from Steadler & using buble etching to expedite the etching process.
Dax,
Please share with us the paper's part number and how much (for price reference & how many pieces)?
One more thing, how you make Dbl side board in short point ( if eleberate more, more better).
Anyway thanks for info and souces ....
Sorry for my english .....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mizk_electro
Cracking Team
Active Member
    Muted
Offline
Posts: 133
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2006, 01:52:01 13:52 » |
|
Other paper ... but not so good compare to canon & HP ... so far:
1. Trace paper .. 2. label paper 3. other low end glosy photo paper ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mizk_electro
Cracking Team
Active Member
    Muted
Offline
Posts: 133
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2006, 09:14:22 09:14 » |
|
Dax, Thanks a lot for sharing your info, man. I have some more thing to ask for guidance ( if you and/or other friends can help and wish to spent some time to comment it....  ) 1. For PCB CAD, now I'm using Eagle 4.16 and only use single side board. I try to do (in eagle) to make double side board by grouping a component ie resister and put it in one place, capacitor in another place, connector in next other place and so on. The problem (may be not a problem), when I run autorouting (with TOP & BOTTOM are set), the result most of the time 100% routed but the saiz of PCB are >< the size of single side board.(FYI, I re-create the component pad ie resister because of the original pad size very small and some time being take out by dril) and A LOT OF VIAS.... some time about 40 vias or more. To me, doing double layer like this ... not so good as you get more via instead of easy place the component.But the board size not so diffrent( double side vs single side board). So may be, you can share some of your experience & guidance on how to make good double layer PCB board. Normally how many vias you have on the board (average for 3 x 4 inch)? or any example ? How the steps to minimise vias? 2. Let say for PIC uC project, how small the track did you usually used?I normally use 30mil and 22 mil clearence (in eagle) to avoid any toner spread on the board. 3. For CAD software, what software you use ? Eagle or Proteus or ?Any good manual/info to study ? 4.If any, any step you follow in making routing .. ie manually doing VCC & GND first and after that go with autorouting? 5. How long the time you take to make one double side board in average?start from print upto finish of drill & etching process? 6. Any info to convert eagle file to proteus & proteus to eagle? also any proteus manual? 7. If any picture of your board, can you share here ... so I can take close look about the quality of board (PCB layout and clearence) as for my benchmark. Sorry for toooooo many guidance to ask ....  Thanks in advance for any guides / comments.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mizk_electro
Cracking Team
Active Member
    Muted
Offline
Posts: 133
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2006, 10:55:44 10:55 » |
|
Hi Dax, Thanks again for your good sharing ... and sorry for my english  Ok ... for the number 1 , I repeat again ( in diffrentway & hope you can understand my english ...  ) 1. FYI, I'm using eagle as PCB CAD. In eagle, I can do single & double layer (basically can make upto 16 layer max but not me ... he he ). As for now, I just making PCB board as single layer only. I do it (single layer) by arrange the components base on the schematic ( to reduce jumper & to simplify autorouting) and do autorouting for single layer only. If there is some unroute track(after doing autorouting), I will route it manual using top layer & bottom layer and will use a copper as bridge for the top layer to connect to bottom layer. For double layer, I just try making it in PC (using eagle) and print out on the paper for top layer & bottom layer (but not doing any double layer bo ardyet). Ok my problem/question are : a) When I make single layer (let say for USB FTP-USB programmer), the PCB layout size is about 2.5 x 4 inch .... and when I make 2 layer (just print on paper) the size roughly about the same size. For the 1 layer, I need to think hard in oder to get good arrangement all the componets on the PCB (for the best autorouting) with few jumpers. But for 2 layer, I can put the components as where I like it to be.So for comparison (in my case): - 1 layer : Pro : less jumper ( dont have via) Cont : time consuming to get all components in good arrangement PCB Size : 2.5 x 4 inch - 2 layer : Pro : require little time to arrage component(because I arrange as where I like) & dont have jumpers. Cont : A lot of VIAS (sometime upto 40++ via ) PCB Size : allmost same (because must give some space for via) - So any experience / advice / steps to share in order to get ( 2 layer PCB ) with less via & small size ? - How do you do in making 2 layer PCB? - You do 2 layer manual / autorouting / half manual ? - What you prefer ... making single layer / 2 layer ? 2. Any comment for autorouting in eagle / any experience ? 3. Is the any auto placer in Protel 99 SE sp6 ? Thanks in advance for your info sharing / guide ... 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mizk_electro
Cracking Team
Active Member
    Muted
Offline
Posts: 133
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2006, 08:05:36 08:05 » |
|
Dax, Thnks for your info & advice .... Sorry for my english ....  ... need to learn some more .... Any way ... thnks a lot & i will move to Protel as you suggest .... may be I will take some time .... & need to find a manual for that also. Also thanks for your time to show a demo of staple 'effect'.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mizk_electro
Cracking Team
Active Member
    Muted
Offline
Posts: 133
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2006, 11:42:16 11:42 » |
|
Dax,
Thnks very much.
Now, I succesfull done with HP Photo laser paper .... the quality about 99.5% (sufficient enough for me) ...
I need just to touch-up just one place ... so it already very good.
I just use your way (just put tissue/toilet paper between iron & HP Photo laser paper & press the iron as much as I want it).
I do this about 1-2 minit for one place ... and lift the iron and put the iron with presure in another place ... and so on.
After that, I put it(PCB) into (while still hot) liquid dishwashing detergent and for about 30 minit. (my best result: I put it in a whole night and in next morning, the paper (HP paper) already separated from the PCB).
If somebody one to know in details, please just let me know.... I want to contribute back this knowledge as my payback to this site (especially DAX).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vsmGuy
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 35
Thank You
-Given: 11
-Receive: 7
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2008, 10:54:57 10:54 » |
|
If you have enough time 9~1.5 hours per board) and a nice laminator, best will be toner transfer.
If you don't have time or don't want to waste time or have money - photoresist !
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Vague
V.I.P
Junior Member
   
Offline
Posts: 50
Thank You
-Given: 528
-Receive: 27
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2008, 08:05:16 08:05 » |
|
Hi I've tried using a CNC mill to make circuit boards. It is very time consuming and quite expensive (fine mill bits are not cheap). It takes quite a while to get everything lined up correctly and then it might take 2 or three hours to mill it. The big advantage is that it will drill the holes for you. If I am just making one board I use the laser and cheap photo paper method and etch it with hydrogen peroxide and hydrochloric acid. I can have a board ready for drilling in about half an hour using this method.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbarney
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2432
Thank You
-Given: 405
-Receive: 544
Uhm? where did pickit put my mute button
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2008, 08:27:50 08:27 » |
|
To everybody who is using the iron on method DO YOURSELF'S A BIG FAVOUR AND BUY A LAMINATOR! you can't beat the consistent heat and pressure the lamintator gives you over manually ironing,I used an iron for years and had good results but the laminator makes it way easier and with way better results and if you use press & peel blue with a laminator I get 100% RESULTS 100% OF THE TIME. And by the way I never could get good result's with press & peel blue using an iron but excellant results using it with a laminator.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ever wonder why Kamikaze pilot's wore helmet's ?
|
|
|
|
mylogin
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 72
Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 16
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2008, 12:16:48 12:16 » |
|
To everybody who is using the iron on method DO YOURSELF'S A BIG FAVOUR AND BUY A LAMINATOR! you can't beat the consistent heat and pressure the lamintator gives you over manually ironing,I used an iron for years and had good results but the laminator makes it way easier and with way better results and if you use press & peel blue with a laminator I get 100% RESULTS 100% OF THE TIME. And by the way I never could get good result's with press & peel blue using an iron but excellant results using it with a laminator.
Make sure you bought the high temperature type of laminator machine. there are two types: low temperature and high temperature. (they are not marked, and you have to find out yourself) the low temperature type can not melt the toner resin and unable to transfer it to the PCB correctly.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbarney
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2432
Thank You
-Given: 405
-Receive: 544
Uhm? where did pickit put my mute button
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2008, 12:30:02 12:30 » |
|
http://www.pulsarprofx.com/decalpro/Vertical/1_MENU/1d_Components/Info_GBC_Personal.html13 popular laminators we tested for use with DecalPRO® and the results are in... THOSE THAT DO WORK! Find on eBay and/or office supply stores: Mfg: GBC • H-100 (current - 4" model) • H-200 (discontinued - 9" model) • H-210 (current - 9" model) • 250 HS (current - 9" model) • H-300 (current - 12" model) • Creative (discontinued - 9" model) Those That DO NOT WORK! Mfg: FELLOWES • Cosmic Laminator (MPL-2) • EXL-95-2 Mfg: STAPLES • LM1910 Mfg: ROYAL • PL-100 • PL-2100 • PL-2112 Mfg: 3M • 9" Scotch Mfg: BANNER AMERICAN • QuickFinish PL100
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ever wonder why Kamikaze pilot's wore helmet's ?
|
|
|
xirix
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 15
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: February 01, 2008, 02:26:33 02:26 » |
|
Can you please detail the procedure of using the laminator for PCB transfer?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbarney
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2432
Thank You
-Given: 405
-Receive: 544
Uhm? where did pickit put my mute button
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: February 01, 2008, 12:36:09 12:36 » |
|
exactly the same as the iron on method except you put the paper and pcb through the laminator instead of ironing,the main differance is the laminator has even heat and pressure where ironing is only hit and miss unless it's a small board
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ever wonder why Kamikaze pilot's wore helmet's ?
|
|
|
Virre
Inactive
Offline
Posts: 4
Thank You
-Given: 2
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: February 04, 2008, 06:46:18 06:46 » |
|
I use tonertransfer with laminator and glossy newsprint from magazines, really pleased with the result. Have never gotten really good results with laser/inkjet papers. Only downside is that it's trickier to see your printed pattern since the paper is already printed on.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sohel
Senior Member
  
Offline
Posts: 437
Thank You
-Given: 152
-Receive: 140
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: February 04, 2008, 08:10:35 08:10 » |
|
Have any one using screen Print for pcb. I think its easy and huge pices for pcb. most of the time i am using this procedure. if some want to say about it then let me know. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chandra2sekhar2000
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 124
Thank You
-Given: 24
-Receive: 18
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: February 04, 2008, 08:41:34 08:41 » |
|
HELLO I AM USING TONER TRANSFER METHOD ONLY .BUT I TRIED SCREEN PRINTING METHOD.IT IS TOO MUCH TIME TAKING PROCESS TO PREPARE THE IMAGE.IT REQUIRES TOO MUCH CLEANING FOR THE MESH AFTER THE JOB IS DONE.SO AGAIN I CAME BACK TO TONER TRANSFER METHOD. I AM ETCHING OUT THE PCB AND AFTER DRILLING I AM DIRECTLY USIING THE PCB FOR SOLDERING.IF I LEFT FOR SOME HOURS ,BOARD IS GETTING RUST.SO I NEED A GOOD METHOD FOR TINNING AND SOLDER MASK. BBARNEY THE IMAGE U HAVE SHOWN IS IN GREEN COLOUR.I THINK IT IS SOLDER MASK. CAN U GIVE SOME DETAILS OF TINNING AND APPLYING SOLDER MASK TO THE PCB. I WILL BE THANK FUL TO U AND ALL .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RsX
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 8
Thank You
-Given: 14
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2008, 06:32:44 06:32 » |
|
HELLO I AM USING TONER TRANSFER METHOD ONLY .BUT I TRIED SCREEN PRINTING METHOD.IT IS TOO MUCH TIME TAKING PROCESS TO PREPARE THE IMAGE.IT REQUIRES TOO MUCH CLEANING FOR THE MESH AFTER THE JOB IS DONE.SO AGAIN I CAME BACK TO TONER TRANSFER METHOD. I AM ETCHING OUT THE PCB AND AFTER DRILLING I AM DIRECTLY USIING THE PCB FOR SOLDERING.IF I LEFT FOR SOME HOURS ,BOARD IS GETTING RUST.SO I NEED A GOOD METHOD FOR TINNING AND SOLDER MASK. BBARNEY THE IMAGE U HAVE SHOWN IS IN GREEN COLOUR.I THINK IT IS SOLDER MASK. CAN U GIVE SOME DETAILS OF TINNING AND APPLYING SOLDER MASK TO THE PCB. I WILL BE THANK FUL TO U AND ALL .
we will be thank ful to u  i use photoresist and i get really good results i'm using 2 neon uv-c but i think the plexiglass is blocking them so the pcb need an exposure of 15 minutes... on the other hand it's not too bad, i always forget the pcb under the uv for 20-25 minutes without overexposures... 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
user112
Junior Member
  Muted
Offline
Posts: 84
Thank You
-Given: 6
-Receive: 130
Salut tuturor(hallo to all)
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2008, 08:54:42 08:54 » |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 09, 2008, 02:57:45 14:57 by user112 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbarney
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2432
Thank You
-Given: 405
-Receive: 544
Uhm? where did pickit put my mute button
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2008, 10:50:04 10:50 » |
|
the solder tinning is called liquid tin and made by MG Chemicalsl you soak the board in it for 5 min and the green color there is actually transparent green laquer spray paint made by Testor the hobby model paint manf. http://www.hobbylinc.com/prods/s_tes.htmhttp://mgchemicals.com/products/421.htmlHELLO I AM USING TONER TRANSFER METHOD ONLY .BUT I TRIED SCREEN PRINTING METHOD.IT IS TOO MUCH TIME TAKING PROCESS TO PREPARE THE IMAGE.IT REQUIRES TOO MUCH CLEANING FOR THE MESH AFTER THE JOB IS DONE.SO AGAIN I CAME BACK TO TONER TRANSFER METHOD. I AM ETCHING OUT THE PCB AND AFTER DRILLING I AM DIRECTLY USIING THE PCB FOR SOLDERING.IF I LEFT FOR SOME HOURS ,BOARD IS GETTING RUST.SO I NEED A GOOD METHOD FOR TINNING AND SOLDER MASK. BBARNEY THE IMAGE U HAVE SHOWN IS IN GREEN COLOUR.I THINK IT IS SOLDER MASK. CAN U GIVE SOME DETAILS OF TINNING AND APPLYING SOLDER MASK TO THE PCB. I WILL BE THANK FUL TO U AND ALL .
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ever wonder why Kamikaze pilot's wore helmet's ?
|
|
|
budi
Newbie
 Muted
Offline
Posts: 14
Thank You
-Given: 4
-Receive: 2
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2008, 02:05:12 14:05 » |
|
i've been trying many kind of of paper for toner transfer with heating and pressure (iron or others), and in my experience sticker paper (printed in the smooth sliperry yellow side) which result the best for me. after ironing let the pcb blow with cool air (i use ordinary fan), until the paper lose/drop by it self from the pcb. then i always see the best result, no carbon left in the paper no carbon crack in the copper, just make sure before ironing get the copper washed ,clean and free from dust and fat (probably fat from your hand, just don't touch the copper side). and make sure the pcb is real flat to accept the transfer (no bad pcb cutting)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mayler
Junior Member
  Muted
Offline
Posts: 68
Thank You
-Given: 14
-Receive: 13
Roger that!
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: February 16, 2008, 06:19:44 18:19 » |
|
I tried with magazine paper and had different expierences... I tried with a color page, the face page (is thicker than the others) and a white page with text. The best result was in a white page. I used toner transfer, used an 1200 dpi image and printed with 1200 dpi resolution (almost any laser printer today makes this resolution). I used the Iron, set in Cotton (controlled the temperature for 180-190 celsius) and pushed as many i could. I transfered a 4 mil text with sucess... And the net width was 14 mil. Perfect transfer of MSSOP part (clearance of 8 mil) , no cuts or fails. The secret is the paper... The paper cant dissolve easily with water... Cannot have many recycled content. And cannot have color in the back or in the front... If you want to make a double face... I dont know what happen, but it appears the paper shrinks, difficulting to center. With white paper, it didn't happen.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Computer Engineer. Digital IC Designer - Cadence certified.
|
|
|
pl4tonas
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 145
Thank You
-Given: 276
-Receive: 195
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: February 21, 2008, 11:35:46 11:35 » |
|
I bought a Laminator today, the GBC H-210, and try the transfer method with it. Even at the higher temperature setting it cannot melt the toner for transfer to the PCB.
It is very disapointing. I tried with different types of paper but still no result. So photoresist is still the best method for me. Ironing for very small PCBs.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbarney
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2432
Thank You
-Given: 405
-Receive: 544
Uhm? where did pickit put my mute button
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: February 21, 2008, 12:12:14 12:12 » |
|
pl4tonas What kind of printer are you using and what paper.if you can find a few sheets of press&peel blue I'am sure you will be impressed also the pcb must be sqeaky clean.there are a few laser printers that don't work very well and the laminator you bought should work and the paper is a factor to you will just have to experiment to find the right combo
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ever wonder why Kamikaze pilot's wore helmet's ?
|
|
|
pl4tonas
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 145
Thank You
-Given: 276
-Receive: 195
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: February 22, 2008, 01:40:22 01:40 » |
|
Hello bbarney, Thanks for your reply. I am using an HP Laserjet1000 printer. I tryied tracing paper and magazine glossy paper. Today I will make some more tests since yesterday I haven't enough time to play.
With an iron, the magazine paper worked but only for small PCB. For larger PCBs it does not work very well. I will carry some more experiments during the next days to find out the correct/proper combination. Press&Peel is not available lockally so I have to order it from internet. I will give it a try as a last resort.
Upon success, I will post my results. Regards P.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TigerX
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 12
Thank You
-Given: 4
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: February 22, 2008, 06:33:17 06:33 » |
|
A few years ago I used serigraphy method. It is cheap and serially producing PCB is possible. Photoresist methos think may be same. I am not sure exatly.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbarney
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2432
Thank You
-Given: 405
-Receive: 544
Uhm? where did pickit put my mute button
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: February 22, 2008, 10:40:23 10:40 » |
|
pl4tonas I'am sure it's probably the paper you are using as the printer and laminator are both perfect to do it HERE'S LINK IN CASE YOU MISSED IT http://www.pulsarprofx.com/PCB/a_Pages/4_Products/4d_Toner_Applicator/Toner_Applicator.htmlHello bbarney, Thanks for your reply. I am using an HP Laserjet1000 printer. I tryied tracing paper and magazine glossy paper. Today I will make some more tests since yesterday I haven't enough time to play.
With an iron, the magazine paper worked but only for small PCB. For larger PCBs it does not work very well. I will carry some more experiments during the next days to find out the correct/proper combination. Press&Peel is not available lockally so I have to order it from internet. I will give it a try as a last resort.
Upon success, I will post my results. Regards P.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ever wonder why Kamikaze pilot's wore helmet's ?
|
|
|
avralam
Active Member
   Muted
Offline
Posts: 146
Thank You
-Given: 153
-Receive: 30
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: February 22, 2008, 02:31:26 14:31 » |
|
Remember! Glossary paper and laser printer method is better than press_n peel from internet shop 1$ A4 sheet!
|
|
« Last Edit: February 23, 2008, 01:22:32 01:22 by avralam »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
luigipolyp
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: February 22, 2008, 03:11:51 15:11 » |
|
i made some pcb's with my router milling machine and use eagle software. i use a plugin to generate g-code to mill a pcb. After that i can drill the holes in my pcb using my milling machine
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bbarney
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2432
Thank You
-Given: 405
-Receive: 544
Uhm? where did pickit put my mute button
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: February 23, 2008, 06:50:06 06:50 » |
|
I disagree with that,I've used glossy paper and my results were not worth the effort and $1 per sheet is cheap if it works everytime not to mention that I would probably make 4 or 5 different pcb out of that one sheet so $1 a sheet is pretty cheap for what I get which are good boards the first time and not frustrated making it over and over till it comes out right. Remember! Glossary paper and laser printer method is better than press_n peel from internet shop 1$ A4 sheet!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ever wonder why Kamikaze pilot's wore helmet's ?
|
|
|
jader
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: February 24, 2008, 03:13:01 03:13 » |
|
ive done toner transfer and it worked really well. the trick is to keep the iron pressed on for the right amount of time. touch up anyparts with a felt tip pen
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tuvoj
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 41
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 7
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: February 27, 2008, 05:36:41 17:36 » |
|
We use a "Sherline" type small CNC machine with a conical carbide engraving bit on FR4 clad PCB. This works VERY WELL for everything BUT multi=layer boards...
We create artwork/gerbers in Protel, then use a prog called "DeskPCB" to do isolation cutting (like LPKF or most other prototyping PCB systems).
Saves time and $ when doing small-run or single protoyping
Cheers-TuvoJ
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vovchik02
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 61
Thank You
-Given: 43
-Receive: 11
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: February 27, 2008, 11:59:28 23:59 » |
|
Photoresist give good result (SO 1.27mm is OK ), but for little number PCB take more time then toner, more chemikal operation and spetial light(be caraful may eyes damage). But toner give more unstable result in chemikal protekt. I like use photoresist.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
esomarmara
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: March 01, 2008, 05:55:03 05:55 » |
|
I use fine quality asetat transparent surface and controlled iron for lines uncorrupt
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mkarim
Newbie
 Muted
Offline
Posts: 10
Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 4
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: March 03, 2008, 04:28:49 04:28 » |
|
I use fine quality asetat transparent surface and controlled iron for lines uncorrupt
Posted on: March 03, 2008, 11:26:36 11:26 - Automerged
Toner transfer method is very cheap,and photo resist method is costly but it profetional quality. mkarim
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 638
Thank You
-Given: 382
-Receive: 336
It's a little funny......
|
 |
« Reply #37 on: March 03, 2008, 12:40:58 12:40 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
|
|
|
Vid4r
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 12
Thank You
-Given: 3
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #38 on: March 10, 2008, 06:30:17 18:30 » |
|
I got my best results by using an adopted CNC with a minimum 200 microns milling cutter... It gave me the best registration for 2 Layer boards (top layer <-> bottom layer) due to automatic registration of the bore holes
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
tek
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 7
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #39 on: March 11, 2008, 10:56:47 10:56 » |
|
Hello I met someone recently this method I get a manual? Thanks
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
heroinb
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: March 28, 2008, 04:47:30 04:47 » |
|
best method is using laser printer. I suggest..
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
marianqt
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 14
Thank You
-Given: 2
-Receive: 4
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: March 29, 2008, 01:10:02 13:10 » |
|
Hello everyone! I hope this short movie are very useful for toner transfer & etching & very cheap method ! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTxPnZLpp_8
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
frasenci
Translator
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 162
Thank You
-Given: 121
-Receive: 84
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: March 29, 2008, 01:34:04 13:34 » |
|
I got my best results by using an adopted CNC with a minimum 200 microns milling cutter... It gave me the best registration for 2 Layer boards (top layer <-> bottom layer) due to automatic registration of the bore holes
How interesting ! I have seen pictures of that work . Would you share what combination of software for PCB design and then for CNC you use ? An links for them ? Thank you
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
edi14_10
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 45
Thank You
-Given: 2
-Receive: 7
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: April 01, 2008, 06:11:37 18:11 » |
|
Hi... does anyone have a good idea to make a precission double layer PCb using toner transfer?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Vid4r
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 12
Thank You
-Given: 3
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: April 02, 2008, 07:42:15 07:42 » |
|
How interesting ! I have seen pictures of that work . Would you share what combination of software for PCB design and then for CNC you use ? An links for them ?
Thank you
I'm using Altium Designer (available on this board) for circuit simulation and pcb layout. The layout of Altium is exported into extended Gerber files. These files can be read by IsoCAM. I use IsoCAM to determine wether I want to do isolation milling or remove unwanted copper completely (both modes may be combined by selecting copper areas to be milled). Again I export gerber files which our cnc @work is able to use...
|
|
« Last Edit: April 02, 2008, 07:46:47 07:46 by Vid4r »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cooperharris
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 90
Thank You
-Given: 72
-Receive: 22
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: April 02, 2008, 09:15:19 09:15 » |
|
personaly I am not a expert in pcb , but I can tell you about my experiences, I tried the first time I made one with a tone transfer and I think I did heat too much the iron and the pcb was a mess! I lost the copper!, so the next time I tried I did it by using a fine point permanent marker and after make the tracks I gave it a acid bath, and It worked perfectly, so ..so far I have not tried with the toner transfer again , but I have heard that some people got to work with it very nicely I think it is just about practice, regarts.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sisar
Inactive
Muted
Offline
Posts: 2
Thank You
-Given: 2
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: April 02, 2008, 05:28:10 17:28 » |
|
I use press-n-peel sheets, http://www.techniks.com/index.htm , they give a very good result, check their website, they have nice tutorial
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
puta
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 75
Thank You
-Given: 248
-Receive: 24
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: April 07, 2008, 04:20:46 04:20 » |
|
I have developed few interface PCB boards using toner transfer (laser printer + iron) successfully after few trial & error for my Explorer-16 dev board.
But the problem is copper strips on the PCB connector is getting oxidised after few days. I have seen many professionally made PCBs have gold plated connector edges, even in Explorer-16 board.
Any one would know whether we could develop that type of gold plated, or other suitable mathod which we could use in home/ hobby environment to stop oxide in the copper PCB connectors.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cooperharris
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 90
Thank You
-Given: 72
-Receive: 22
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: April 16, 2008, 12:08:55 12:08 » |
|
To everybody who is using the iron on method DO YOURSELF'S A BIG FAVOUR AND BUY A LAMINATOR! you can't beat the consistent heat and pressure the lamintator gives you over manually ironing,I used an iron for years and had good results but the laminator makes it way easier and with way better results and if you use press & peel blue with a laminator I get 100% RESULTS 100% OF THE TIME. And by the way I never could get good result's with press & peel blue using an iron but excellant results using it with a laminator.
where could w buy a Lamlinator?, or maybe we could build it? , thansk for your answer. regards.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
forter
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 122
Thank You
-Given: 597
-Receive: 22
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: April 17, 2008, 06:30:49 06:30 » |
|
I have used iron method to transfer toner. A few week ago I try to use Laminator - the results is very nice! All is very accurately, no more sticking together tracks. But I think a temperature needs to be enlage a litle.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yahoo
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 113
Thank You
-Given: 41
-Receive: 57
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: April 17, 2008, 08:45:59 08:45 » |
|
I know that using laminators is a very good way to transfer the toner. Which one to buy? Most of them they have temperature range 100-160°C and I think it's ok but I'm worry about the max. material thickness which is 10mil and if the pcb is 1mm and more it might not pass with the toner paper. Can you recommend me a good brand and model? I want to try this. Thank you in advance!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kamegang
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: April 17, 2008, 10:53:44 10:53 » |
|
The reality is that the method is quite old. In the case of INK JET modified to print with indelible ink is already something old, and the results are not very good. If you want to see an example of modification here you leave a link. To my mind the best away remains the silk.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
forter
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 122
Thank You
-Given: 597
-Receive: 22
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: April 17, 2008, 12:47:52 12:47 » |
|
Yahoo! I am using chinese made laminator SIGMA EL142. I think any model of laminator will be good. The main is temperature, and I think a temperature in any model is approximately equal.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yahoo
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 113
Thank You
-Given: 41
-Receive: 57
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: April 17, 2008, 07:32:34 19:32 » |
|
Yahoo! I am using chinese made laminator SIGMA EL142. I think any model of laminator will be good. The main is temperature, and I think a temperature in any model is approximately equal.
I'm worry that the pcb with thickness of 1mm cannot pass through the laminator because I saw that most of the models can handle only 10mil max material thickness. Is that true? I need a laminator for max 2mm copper pcb + PnP blue sheet
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pl4tonas
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 145
Thank You
-Given: 276
-Receive: 195
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: April 18, 2008, 04:04:04 16:04 » |
|
Through a laminator you can pass only the thin type of PCB, the 0,032" thickness. It has about half the thickness of the standard PCB.
Also have in mind that, you need to pass the PCB about 10 times through the laminator in order to have good results. This is performed with the heat setting to maximum. A laminator does not have the heating power of an Iron but with around 10 passes you get much better results.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
persiangulf
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: April 18, 2008, 10:12:52 22:12 » |
|
Using laminators will give people mixed results and most laminators are not designed to feed a typical PCB due to thickness, this results in your lamintor loosing its pressing pressure overtime in the centre depending on how you insert your board. Also, the temperature is low on most laminators, but since you guys are into electronics, its easy to mod a laminator to operate at higher temperatures, but beware you do not melt the housing.
Laminators are not reliable in the sense that you might have to buy a few to find the right one, and even then, you risk damaging it by continuously feeding over-thick material through.
Using the Iron is the riskiest and most unreliable method regardless of which paper and how you use it, unless your end board is small and single sided.
The most common problems with toner transfer is the printer. Today, most new printers are designed to deposit as little as possible toner on paper, and most toners today are designed to provide the same amount of colour saturation with far less toner present on paper, meaning, its good if you want more pages per cartridge, but bad news if you want more toner on each page for transfer purposes. I have not come across any printer allowing you to choose how much toner you want used, although all have the typical economy, normal and best modes. The problem is, the best modes today give out as much toner as the economy mode 10 years ago.
This is due to better toners being produced and newer laser technology allowing the same print with less toner. You guys also have to note, there are different types of toners and some melt at different temperatures, although not wide on a spectrum, but enough to make some toner transfers successful whilst others fail.
I remember once, the office printer/copier was ordered by the boss to have its cartridges refilled with non-brand toner rather than replacing the cartridge with the same brand toner to save money, which resulted in disaster. The refill toner was melting far too easy and resulted in the pages full of smudges (i say smudge, but its different to that of inkjet...... imagine a stamp being pressed onto a piece of paper extra hard, everything gets bolder) where one letter was joined to the next, a's looked like fat b's etc. Anyway, the printer/copier was also ruined and needed a service.
Also, what happens, is some people find, this paper works for them, or that laminator works for them, then they tell others, forgetting that that particular laminator, and paper only works with a sufficient amount of toner present on the paper to begin with.
Laminator/Iron Method:
For newer models of laser printers, the thinnest possible paper should be used that has a glossy feel, however, you have to watch out you don't use too a thin of a paper otherwise it will jam in your printer as it tears during feed in. For single sided, cut out the circuit from the paper using scissor or others, and place on the ccb (copper clad board/pcb) and feed through your laminator. You can use normal photo/glossy paper, but will not work on most 2005> printers.
If your laminator has a habit to disposition your paper circuit during feed in, then simply use a small strip of masking tape attached on two opposite sides of the board fixing the paper circuit on the ccb. Some laminators require you to feed it in a number of times before the toner sticks to the board, some less and some more, but I have not come across any that does it in 1 or 2 goes. Once you feel the toner has stuck to the ccb, put it in warm or normal temp. water until the paper used tears away without effort. This is where many people go wrong, they try to scrub off, or use slight force to take away the paper which results in cut tracks or other errors.
Anyway, if you leave it long enough, it should come off easier than a wet tissue, slowly start from areas with less tracks/pads then when entering areas of detail, try to rub your finger across the same way of the majority of the tracks, in other words, rub along the detail, if you have tracks going from right to left, rub from right to left.
If done right you will have a nice toner transfer. Back to the feed in step, to ensure you're laminators springs and pressure quality remains constant over continuous use, feed in the board+paper orientated to allow the widest entry, this may result in you having to feed in a few more times, but allows your laminator to work for such usage longer. On the other hand, if you feed in orientated so the width is the least, you may have a better transfer but you also risk ruining the laminator quicker. This also depends on your laminator, and how it applies pressure,whether by springs etc.
Some of you may find that your printer uses toner that is hard to melt or that there is not enough toner even at best quality, this will normally result in the laminator only sticking the paper circuit on to the ccb, but not transfering the toner, and it will peel off without leaving any trace of toners. 1. this could be due to an improper cleaned ccb, but normally, if it was not cleaned properly, then there should be atleast some sign of transfer. If there is no sign of transfer, then run the thing through the laminator a few times again until it sticks again... whilst its still warm/hot from the laminator, grab the iron and finish it off there.
Iron:
If your laminator does not do the job, it still is a good tool to fix on the paper circuit on to the ccb before ironing. If you are ironing, you have 2 options, either have it on a very hot setting, but be very brief and confident that you are applying even pressure. The second option is to use a medium heat setting, and then taking your time applying pressure.
Make sure the bottom of your iron is cleaning so the paper circuit does not come off or move off the ccb whilst your moving the iron. Don't use steam or any steaming that your iron provides, it does not make much difference and may also ruin the process. One thing you can do, which works well if done right, is straight/immediately after you lift the iron the final time confident the toner is stuck and transferred (I am saying Transferred, but the truth is, the toner will always be sandwiched stuck on both the ccb, and paper, unless the paper you use is special like PnP) then add a few ice cube on the back of the paper.. if done right, the toner due to sudden change in temp. will repel from the cold side (paper side) and stick to the ccb. Then proceed to drop the whole thing in warm - normal temp. water. Boiling or Hot water is not recommended, UNLESS you have bad bond or a different type of toner that works well repelling from paper under such conditions.
Etching:
The etching process is simple, dependent on the etching solution and environment, it shouldn't take more than 5-40 minutes. I recommend everyone to buy a etching bath, it makes the whole process faster, and also allows you to roughly estimate when the etching is done. For ferric chloride solution, add 5-10 seconds on top after you etch each board as its corrosiveness degrades according to usage. Add 20 seconds or more if you are etching larger boards. These times will vary dependent on the ratio of the solution and water as well as how much solution there is for the size of board you use.
UV Exposure Method
The BEST way, and beleive me, I have tried all the previous methods, is to use photosensitve copper clad boards. If you are thinking of spraying your own boards for them to become photosensitive, its not really worth it, unless you have switched to using photosensitive boards and you just want to convert some of your old normal copper clad boards. Buy photosensitive copper clad boards to begin with, and the price difference is not much these days, probably around 0.5 x more than the normal copper clad boards.
The best light source is UV-B tan tubes. You can buy a facial tanning machine for around $50 on ebay that has 4x15watt tubes that is housed with a timer. All you have to do is tilt it so it shines upwards, place a clear piece of glass or open up an empty scanner and take off of the top glass/clear plastic unit with the lid attached an place it on the tan unit. If you want, you can make a custom case using a scanner, and disassemble the tanning unit and place the tubes, starters, ballast and circuitry inside, but personally, I wouldn't bother, because you never know when the winter blues might hit you, which is when the tanning machine will become usefull ;-) You can use UV-A or UV-C but is not as fast as the UV-B tubes.
Use a frosted tracing paper to print on and place over the photosensitve copper clad board, and leave under then the uvb light. You need to use a frosted tracing paper so the uv rays are spread evenly, otherwise you will get areas of overexposure and areas of underexposure. You will also loose the ability to do fine tracks if you don't use froster tracing paper. If you can't get frosted tracing paper, DON'T WORRY, all you need to do, is just frost the glass/clear plastic which you will be placing the boards on and use acetate printing paper instead. There is not much difference on whether the clear plastic/glass panel is frosted or whether you use frosted paper instead.
All you need is something to diffuse the light evenly, and if you find other methods then thats fine too. The only thing is, there shouldn't be too much distance between the diffuser and the printed tracks. The distance between the UVB tubes and the board should be around 5-7 cm. The further away, the longer it takes, the closer, the more chance of uneven exposure. With a diffusor, 7 cm is the optimum for 4x15w spaced the same way as the facial tanning machines.
Anyway, when I started using these 4x15w uv-b tanning light i used to leave my pccb's for around 5-7 minutes, thinking I needed to see atleast abit of the tracks on the photosensitive side before I dip them into the developing solution. Everytime I dipped the board in the developing solution, the circuit got dark quickly on the board and then melted away in a matter of 10 seconds. This was odd, I thought the solution was too concentrated etc. I blamed everything except my exposure time. I then realized 5-7 minutes exposure is toooo much, I now expose my boards for 30 seconds under the uv light, and then dip them into the developer for 20 seconds, then give them a rinse and then off to the etchant.
It is easy to do double sided too, there are numerous way, I will tell you the way I think is the most reliable:
Double Sided:
1. Print-to-file both sides of your circuit board, use photoshop or another photoediting program and align both of your circuits end to end, but with one of the mirrored and the other flipped in a way so when you print, you can simply fold the paper and the circuits will align with each when you look through the paper under light. The gap between the fold should not be much, however, draw a center line in the photo editing suite you are using so you know where to fold.
Once you have printed on paper your circuit design, before folding, trim off excess paper, leaving only 0.5cm / 5mm gap between the edges of the circuit and the trim. Now fold precisely where your center line was, further sharped the fold by going over it with a ruler or something hard, watch out the design does not come off alignment when doing this, keep checking under light and use masking tape etc. if needed to help you.
Remove anything you may have used such as masking tap and place your pccp/ccp in between the paper so its like a pita sandwich. Use masking tape to hold the paper onto the board on both sides so it does not move when you flip it over under the UV light or when passing through the laminator. In the case of UV you should use a tracing paper because acetate is hard to fold etc.
Once you paper is secured to the board, drill 2 holes precisely through to the mounting pads (you need to add some during the design, or add some non-usable pads so you can check your alignment, make sure the pads you add are opposite of each other on both axis's such as ona hypotenuse of a triangle). Now check carefully to see if he holes align with the paper marks. If so, then proceed with lamination/ironing/uv exposure.
In my opinion, the best method for circuit development is the photosensitive method. I have never ever been able to get such detail, clarity and track width as I do with the photosensitive method. It is by far the best method for 3 reasons, 1. It is consistent, you can rely on getting the exact same results each time 2. You can achieve far more detail, surface mount, tqfp, no problem. 3. it is quick
You may have tried it and not been able to get good results, but i strongly suggest to use my method, and also ensure you buy ready photosensitive copper clad boards, and also ensure you use UVB with a diffusor. tw8
|
|
« Last Edit: April 18, 2008, 10:21:26 22:21 by persiangulf »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pvasilik
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: April 19, 2008, 02:28:22 02:28 » |
|
Hello i study electrical engιneer, and now learn to make PCB.In my university use protel '98.what is the best program for draw pcb because ths protel 98 is stupid!!!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Parmin
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 572
Thank You
-Given: 408
-Receive: 131
Very Wise (and grouchy) Old Man
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: April 19, 2008, 03:22:56 03:22 » |
|
Yo persiangulf. That is a very thorough explanation on home PCB manufacturing. Congratulations! for a newbie, you certainly have contributed greatly and more thoughtful than most other oldies and that including me  Now, my request, I have trouble in following your double sided board explanation. Could you give some illustration to that technique? maybe some pictures etc.
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I have said something that offends you, please let me know, so I can say it again later.
|
|
|
persiangulf
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: April 19, 2008, 01:03:58 13:03 » |
|
Parmin, nice signature. Double sided is really easy, but I guess the detail above might make it sound hard to some, and as we are human, we all think visually when learning practical things, so image descriptions are always good. I will either draw some images to help you understand, or take some pictures of doing a double sided board. I'll add them here later on today or tomorrow. If there is anything else, let me know so I can add them to the post. Regards, PG Posted on: April 19, 2008, 07:46:27 19:46 - Automerged
Hello i study electrical engιneer, and now learn to make PCB.In my university use protel '98.what is the best program for draw pcb because ths protel 98 is stupid!!!!
It's really about preference, but there are a few packages that hit the taste of most people. Here are some of the top ones: 1. Diptrace - Easy to use, nice UI, good library and autoroute function. 2. Eagle from CADSoft - Difficult to learn, complex UI, but powerful program that allows you to virtually design boards for any process with excellent autorouting. 3. Orcad - Fairly complex, tedious UI, loads of features, simulator and various other powerful tools such as the autoroute function. 4. Altium Designer - haven't used this one. 5. Proteus - haven't used it, the screenshot put me off  There are others, and there are loads of threads around about PCB Cad packages, but the BEST one in my opinion is Diptrace. Diptrace is easy to use, with a small learning curve. You won't even have to read the manuals, its one of those programs that you can begin using straight away. I can't stress how easy it is to use Diptrace, definitely try it, before trying the rest. And if anyone else is using other pcb programs but hasn't tried Diptrace, then PLEASE DO TRY IT!! This is because it helped me stop growing white hairs. It's a likable package.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
puta
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 75
Thank You
-Given: 248
-Receive: 24
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: April 19, 2008, 05:09:34 17:09 » |
|
persiangulf
You seems have done significant R&D on the PCB with various methods, and realy appreciate your nice effort to share your experience in the forum.
Do you ever experiment with plating (Nickel or gold) the PCB copper strips on the board, specially when you have edge connector on the PCB?
.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
yahoo
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 113
Thank You
-Given: 41
-Receive: 57
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: April 20, 2008, 09:41:13 09:41 » |
|
Hi persiangulf, I can confirm that DipTrace is realy very easy PCB design software. I have experience using Orcad & Cadstar for many years and their price is so high for the "demo" libraries they provide. First time I see so simple and user friendly interface of DipTrace and in combination with complete set of libraries - I'll switch to it. Thank you for your suggestion!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OleRuffo
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 40
Thank You
-Given: 36
-Receive: 9
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: April 22, 2008, 06:28:22 18:28 » |
|
Hi all: Apart of the great tuto that persiangulf leave to us i want to share some personal experience about all this: i dunno if you know the T-shirts transfer irons, they have a large (40 by 40 cms) evenly heated plate and an assembly to press the iron against the base and most of them have a temperature control, so you can make a very decent PCB with just mag paper and a laser printer, i can say that even better than a laminator because you have no chance to damage the unit and no rolls that would move you design when you feed it. This iron seves a double propuse, if you can get the dupont or Kolon Dry film Resist, you can create you own photosensitive boards with this iron. so you can switch from laser transer to Photoresist with almost the same hardware another good thing is that this irons are no so expensive like some professional laminators. http://www.ikolon.com/eng/films/dry_film/dry_film_intro.htmlhttp://tyvek.com.mx/Imaging_Materials/en_US/products/dryfilmPhotoresist/index.htmlHope this helps Cheers PS i almost forget... you can make your solder mask with Dry film photoresist too! 
|
|
« Last Edit: April 22, 2008, 06:32:08 18:32 by OleRuffo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
joprinz
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 33
Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 10
|
 |
« Reply #62 on: April 23, 2008, 05:14:24 17:14 » |
|
I use toner transfer using normal Glossy Paper (most people would like to use a photo gloss paper. But using them increases your cost per board.) But with Glossy Paper the heat transfer time is increased. About 5-6 minutes under an electric iron with some pressure using your hands is sufficient.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Parmin
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 572
Thank You
-Given: 408
-Receive: 131
Very Wise (and grouchy) Old Man
|
 |
« Reply #63 on: April 23, 2008, 06:45:05 18:45 » |
|
i dunno if you know the T-shirts transfer irons,
ya know ole, I used this method before, but its unfortunate that I cannot get it right. Tshirt are made of flexible compressable material, so when you press them they will flatten and levels. When using this method on PCB, I found that PCBs never is 100% level, and it cannot compress on the high/low points, thus the toner were never transferred 100%. The difference is in micron but this made a lot of difference. You must have special method to make the PCB ultra smooth and level.. I like to try it.. please share.
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I have said something that offends you, please let me know, so I can say it again later.
|
|
|
OleRuffo
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 40
Thank You
-Given: 36
-Receive: 9
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: April 23, 2008, 11:22:28 23:22 » |
|
Hiyas Parmin: i always put a soft and heavy cardboard (like some dense cartoon box material) over the PCB and with the pressure and heat amount that the iron can give to the assembly i had no problems with the transfered image, i always smooth the sides of the PCB with sandpaper to get a little angle ( like a knife sharp) then i put the laser printout and then the cardboard , and press about a minute , then i release and let go cold, and soak it with a bit warm water, when i can see the image trough the paper i start to remove it gently. the heat flows really nice over the cartoon and hit the PCB correctly cheers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Parmin
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 572
Thank You
-Given: 408
-Receive: 131
Very Wise (and grouchy) Old Man
|
 |
« Reply #65 on: April 24, 2008, 12:19:05 00:19 » |
|
Hi Ole T I have tried the cardboard method I even tried heat sink foams, cloth, High density closed and/or open celled foam etc of various thickness still it doesn't work well:
I think I am missing something important somewhere.
|
|
|
Logged
|
If I have said something that offends you, please let me know, so I can say it again later.
|
|
|
fr5cu
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #66 on: April 24, 2008, 03:25:23 03:25 » |
|
What is the temparature of iron or laminator? Is critical temperature?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OleRuffo
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 40
Thank You
-Given: 36
-Receive: 9
|
 |
« Reply #67 on: April 24, 2008, 09:30:30 09:30 » |
|
The iron i use is somewhat old so i don't have a real temperature setting, i put the knob to 180 ( in theory should be 180 C) and let the press down for a minute, i sand the board with a very fine metal sand paper ( gently!!) and then i clean it with acetone (before the transfer process, of course  ). Here you have a image before etching Cheers BTW i find useless to try a QTFP64 + footprint with the toner method cause the pads appear bridged, same for another fine pitch packs.
|
|
« Last Edit: April 29, 2008, 04:36:55 16:36 by OleRuffo »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ucup
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 9
Thank You
-Given: 4
-Receive: 2
|
 |
« Reply #68 on: April 28, 2008, 11:09:29 23:09 » |
|
I usually use a 60gr paper with a laser jet printer. and then oily on it with sunflowerseed oil until the paper become transparance, then next process follow the step that already post.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
fr5cu
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #69 on: April 30, 2008, 06:38:55 06:38 » |
|
hi OleRuffo, have you a video of your réalisation of PCB with TTF? I have some deformation, the line is not parallele!! Wath is your pression (press down)?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
OleRuffo
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 40
Thank You
-Given: 36
-Receive: 9
|
 |
« Reply #70 on: May 01, 2008, 08:11:18 20:11 » |
|
Hi Fr5: Sorry i have no videos about the process, in fact right now I'm working with a very dense PCB so its not suitable for this technique ( not even for photo resist) 4 layers, some QTFP 80-140 pins and some other fine pitch parts that i had send to produce in a professional facility). the press pressure is unique (Can't be controlled), just a handle that one pull down until lock, i have no idea how much is too much. once i finish my actual work i will try to post some images of the whole thing.  About the deformation...maybe, just maybe your press don't push evenly, or the level mechanism make a slight lateral movement? just an idea  Cheers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HeliEye
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 8
Thank You
-Given: 13
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #71 on: October 17, 2010, 08:48:04 08:48 » |
|
Hi guys. I thought I would chime in here with a few thoughts. I print using an Epson R200 printer, using precision A4 Inkjet film and I always get good results. I use JetStar Premium A4 10 sheet pack from http://www.megauk.com/artwork_films.phpAlso photo boards from same supplier http://www.megauk.com/pcb_laminates.phpI have a 4 tube UV box (from RS components) Developer is Seno Liquid Dev conc 1Ltr for 10Ltr - 20ltrs http://www.megauk.com/pcb_chemicals.phpI use this 1.1KG Fine Etch Crystals for 5 Ltrs for etching in a bubble etching tank, also from same company. I make a lot of pcb's with fine pitch IC's and have no problems, many of which are 2 oz copper. Using this method I can re-use the artwork over and over again. I never was a fan of the iron-on method, or using laser printers, the resolution on the R200 is much higher at 5760 dpi. Steve
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ktek
Junior Member
  Muted
Offline
Posts: 39
Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 5
|
 |
« Reply #73 on: October 19, 2010, 07:28:30 07:28 » |
|
I have spent much time (and money) to make PCB with acid, film, etc Now I find more convenient a (Italian) company that make prototypes of pcb example: 2 PCB 40x40 mm Dual layer 28 €
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mario2000
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 154
Thank You
-Given: 313
-Receive: 462
|
 |
« Reply #74 on: October 19, 2010, 07:06:36 19:06 » |
|
I have spent much time (and money) to make PCB with acid, film, etc Now I find more convenient a (Italian) company that make prototypes of pcb example: 2 PCB 40x40 mm Dual layer 28 €
do it yourself for less than 5€ is best for me, 28 € is a lot of money 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ktek
Junior Member
  Muted
Offline
Posts: 39
Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 5
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: October 21, 2010, 01:20:03 01:20 » |
|
Ok Ok Mario
I agree with you
In past I made own cs, but I do not say how many dresses damaged from acid and then considering the lost time, drilling, manual jumping vias, etc
actually with more few euros I have a very professional result
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ChaosReigns
Active Member
   Muted
Offline
Posts: 119
Thank You
-Given: 68
-Receive: 248
Chaos Reigns Supreme Before There Is Order
|
 |
« Reply #76 on: December 22, 2010, 01:38:41 01:38 » |
|
Step by step instructions along with pics. Hope this helps somebody. http://www.riccibitti.com/pcb/pcb.htm
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Magnox
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 245
Thank You
-Given: 937
-Receive: 268
Oink!
|
 |
« Reply #77 on: December 25, 2010, 02:27:01 14:27 » |
|
I found that making the kit required for photoresist-style PCB making was part of the fun. I suppose it depends on whether one is mostly a hobbyist or serious student/professional though. I've always been a hobbyist, so the extra time required to make my own boards and fact that I can do everything myself, and save money, is appropriate. If I wanted to publish anything I would probably have a board made.
Anyway, I've tried most of the available methods and find making a transparency with a laser printer and using a pre-sensitized board the best for fine pitch. I can reliably do down to 0.5mm tqfp double sided. I've used Brother, Oki and now an HP laserjet printer, all with good results on laserstar film. I made a double-sided UV exposure box from thin wood and a heated bubble etching tank from acrylic sheet, an aquarium air pump and a chain of power resistors in heat shrink tubing.
For etching I much prefer ammonium persulphate to ferric chloride. It's much cleaner and easier to see how etching is progressing.
For larger scale stuff, i.e. nothing smaller than 0.1" (maybe with a single trace between i.c. pins) then I print onto glossy photo paper and do the iron-it-on and soak-it-off trick with an iron. That works OK, but not perfectly.
I did buy a high temperature (180 Celcius) laminater that can take 1.6mm thick material, but it takes so many passes through that it's quicker to just use the clothes iron!
Plated though holes are possible by using PCB repair kits like the Copperset tubes. A bit fiddly to do but with care they work perfectly. These days I stick to SMD parts as much as I can though; it's much easier.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
night_mare
Junior Member
  Muted
Offline
Posts: 57
Thank You
-Given: 24
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #78 on: February 11, 2011, 10:35:46 10:35 » |
|
Here is my one...... I ve use "Readers Digest" magazine Paper  Its work very well for me 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
hodahel
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 94
Thank You
-Given: 139
-Receive: 5
Catch me...
|
 |
« Reply #79 on: February 14, 2011, 03:17:19 03:17 » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bigmaurizio
Newbie
 Muted
Offline
Posts: 9
Thank You
-Given: 11
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #80 on: March 27, 2013, 03:55:18 15:55 » |
|
Photoreist is the better, but not fast and more expensive. Toner transfer using photo paper (for ex. hp glossy is economic and work very well) is good too, but less resolution and maybe hard to make a good pcd for smd devices. I usually use toner transfer for double layer, photoresist for single layer. To etching a mix of 20% solution HCl and 9% solution H2O2, it's very fast, clean and economic
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mentor
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 20
Thank You
-Given: 61
-Receive: 3
|
 |
« Reply #81 on: April 06, 2013, 09:07:36 21:07 » |
|
I already tried with dry-film (from ebay) and the toner transfer method. I use a cheap Scotch laminator (TL901) that I bought from Amazon.
Both works fine, as soon as you learn how to work with then. For instance, with this laminator and the transfer method, printing with a Xerox printer, I have to pass the board about 20 to 25 times in the laminator to guarantee that the toner will fully transfer to the board.
On the other hand, I had some problems with bubbles when applying the dry-film. But carefully working with it and the bubbles were gone.
Definitively the dry-film have a better resolution.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pickit2
Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 4214
Thank You
-Given: 722
-Receive: 2789
There is no evidence that I muted SoNsIvRi
|
 |
« Reply #82 on: May 28, 2019, 06:26:15 06:26 » |
|
old topic seen this no heat toner transfer https://youtu.be/cVhSCEPINpM
|
|
|
Logged
|
Note: Season & New Year Give Away. 3 year Holiday for Zero Posting
|
|
|
ratovarius
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 88
Thank You
-Given: 1002
-Receive: 147
|
 |
« Reply #83 on: May 28, 2019, 07:02:58 07:02 » |
|
Good method! I didn't know about it!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PICker
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 146
Thank You
-Given: 152
-Receive: 91
|
 |
« Reply #84 on: May 28, 2019, 07:54:24 07:54 » |
|
I'm doing some experiments with the UV-curable paint usually used for protecting PCB tracks ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvU2yyfH-XE) for making a PCB by using a cheap UV oven ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QDpAUkfjY8). This seem to work no so bad but I need further tests. In alternative the Heat tone trasfer with laser-printed ink on copper works very well, maily when I use magazine paper.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ahmad_k
SCG Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 669
Thank You
-Given: 154
-Receive: 1162
|
 |
« Reply #85 on: May 28, 2019, 11:47:25 11:47 » |
|
I always use UV PCB method. you can get the highest quality in that method. also all methods (Except milling) require some sort of Ferric-chloride or similar for etching. So there is no reason why people don't use this method.
you can make your own exposure box using old scanner
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FTL
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 75
Thank You
-Given: 140
-Receive: 32
|
 |
« Reply #86 on: May 28, 2019, 12:14:42 12:14 » |
|
I think most nail polish removers are acetone based. Apparently there are non-acetone based ones that use methyl acetate (easier on skin?). The one in the video does not say "non-acetone", so I'm guessing it is acetone based.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|