|
Bart
Guest
|
 |
« on: November 08, 2007, 01:31:37 13:31 » |
|
Does anyone use cc8e ( http://www.bknd.com/)? I know very little about C,, but this seems very good... It appears to generate tight asm code.. Does anybody have a copy that will do more than 1024 locations...they willing to share.? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vovchik02
Junior Member
 Offline
Posts: 62
Thank You
-Given: 43
-Receive: 13
|
|
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2007, 05:49:52 05:49 » |
|
MPL@B C18 is better for PIC18XXX. And easy download "Student edition" or modifi to full.
Find on forum.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
robban
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 265
Thank You
-Given: 34
-Receive: 38
Warrior
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 12:05:58 00:05 » |
|
I would also like to find the full(or RED) CC8E from B. Knudsen. If it is as good as the CC5X, it's cerainly worthwhile...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Code Warrior
|
|
|
sam_des
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 256
Thank You
-Given: 130
-Receive: 151
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 05:26:47 17:26 » |
|
Hi,
I am too waiting for this one. & I bet it is as good as CC5X. I have just compiled few my MPLAB-C18 & PICC-18 programs & amazed to see the results. Optimization is really TOP-CLASS. Though, like CC5X it needs some time to get hang of it, but after that it is smooth sail.
Alas.. there is no RED edition for CC8E only STANDARD & EXTENDED editions.
Can anyone generate license files for CC5X & CC8E ? Or keygen ??
It'll be of great help.
regards,
sam_des
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never be afraid to do something new. Remember Amateurs built the Ark, Professionals built the Titanic !
|
|
|
robban
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 265
Thank You
-Given: 34
-Receive: 38
Warrior
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 19, 2007, 12:28:20 12:28 » |
|
I guess we really have to go underground to find CC5X and CC8E licence files. For me, less is more. Since I have to convince my financiers that I can do whatever I do with a tiny 16F628, I have to rely on the CC5X beta version, otherwise I can't compete with the Indians or the Chinese. On the other hand, 8K of hex output words isn't too bad...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Code Warrior
|
|
|
|
Bart
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 29, 2007, 02:16:46 14:16 » |
|
There is also a cc8test version that will compile large pgm [ I guess to show that syntax is ok] but the output is crippled,,,no hex file output,,, and the assembly output tags are all the same.....the generated code looks correct,,,,
someone with a lot of time and very good debuigger/dissassembler might be able to figure out a work around....
I'm not sure if there is a license code/serial ,,,,may just be a different compiled version....
Posted on: November 20, 2007, 11:00:20 11:00 - Automerged
I guess I will abandon my efforts to rev engineer cc8e for a workaround .. I just don,t
have enough win32 programming skills, I will try to figure out how to link modules togather.
Does anyone have info about linking cc5x or cc8e modules, the info is a bit
cryptic to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
robban
Senior Member
Offline
Posts: 265
Thank You
-Given: 34
-Receive: 38
Warrior
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2007, 08:00:21 20:00 » |
|
As long as You just have one main() in a module, You should go clear..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Code Warrior
|
|
|
|
