glenndr_15
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 139
Thank You
-Given: 20
-Receive: 72
|
 |
« on: April 04, 2009, 06:30:46 06:30 » |
|
What is the difference between the s series vs the c series?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
samir
Active Member
   Muted
Offline
Posts: 181
Thank You
-Given: 27
-Receive: 21
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2009, 08:55:55 08:55 » |
|
in atmel one one diff is S series can be programed using low volatge in system programing method so only six pin header is req to program chip onboard
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
microkid
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 129
Thank You
-Given: 45
-Receive: 23
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2009, 04:41:53 04:41 » |
|
There are some other differences too
For example voltage rating is different for 'S' series
Mostly minor improvements added
Checkout the datasheet for more accurate differences
MicroKid
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never Never Never giveup
|
|
|
ali_asadzadeh
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 82
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 12
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2009, 07:45:27 07:45 » |
|
as others said it can be programmed in system and it also have watchdog and a second DPTR.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
chyun3
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 65
Thank You
-Given: 43
-Receive: 6
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2009, 04:09:55 04:09 » |
|
C series need high voltage parallel programming to burn in the hex code...not recommend...better go for the S series that support ISP...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
avrPassion
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 10
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 4
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2009, 12:27:28 12:27 » |
|
I have heard that the protocol of ISP in the S series of 8051 is the same as ISP protocol that is used by the AVR chips. I have AVRISP programmer and the schematic file of it. I can post the pcb file of the AVRISP programmers too. Can we use AVRISP programmer to program the S series of 8051? what software should we use?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
glenndr_15
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 139
Thank You
-Given: 20
-Receive: 72
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2009, 05:09:58 05:09 » |
|
can I use the source code or hex file of the C series for S series? or vice versa?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
avrPassion
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 10
Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 4
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2009, 09:34:21 09:34 » |
|
Yes, you can
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pak
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 61
Thank You
-Given: 5
-Receive: 17
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 14, 2009, 12:58:20 00:58 » |
|
I have heard that the protocol of ISP in the S series of 8051 is the same as ISP protocol that is used by the AVR chips. I have AVRISP programmer and the schematic file of it. I can post the pcb file of the AVRISP programmers too. Can we use AVRISP programmer to program the S series of 8051? I tried both AT89S53 and ATMega8 with ISP programmer for http://www.lancos.com/prog.html .It's working for more detail, you may check it out that site. It has hardware and software programmer. All you need to change is the reset pin polarity. pak
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
oscareev
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 14
Thank You
-Given: 6
-Receive: 1
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 14, 2009, 06:32:21 06:32 » |
|
The big difference between 89C and 89S is the SPI port, besides its programming.
La gran diferencia entre 89C y 89S es el puerto SPI, ademas su programacion.
regards
cali - colombia
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
technovm
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 102
Thank You
-Given: 71
-Receive: 111
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: September 24, 2010, 12:59:22 12:59 » |
|
if a capacitor 0.1uf is connected to port of 89S51, which is connected to a key, key will not work. whereas it works with 89C51
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
metal
Global Moderator
Hero Member
   
Offline
Posts: 2420
Thank You
-Given: 862
-Receive: 678
Top Topic Starter
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2010, 01:22:00 13:22 » |
|
Strange finding, can you explain why?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
technovm
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 102
Thank You
-Given: 71
-Receive: 111
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: September 28, 2010, 06:47:02 06:47 » |
|
Strange finding, can you explain why?
I could not find out why. I have searched in many forums for the answer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rentau
Junior Member

Offline
Posts: 44
Thank You
-Given: 10
-Receive: 15
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: September 29, 2010, 04:06:12 04:06 » |
|
.1uF doesn't matter at all IMHO, also you should consider what port,pin your using, if they have internal pull-up or not, or any shared I/O
|
|
|
Logged
|
everything has its beginning ,not all has its end~
|
|
|
technovm
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 102
Thank You
-Given: 71
-Receive: 111
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: October 08, 2010, 08:52:30 08:52 » |
|
i have connected key to port 1.7 of 89s52, with a pull up resistor of 3.3k and 0.1uf capacitro to ground. The key does not work. If i replace 89s52 with 89c52 the key functions as desired.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
microkid
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 129
Thank You
-Given: 45
-Receive: 23
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 09, 2011, 07:54:36 07:54 » |
|
There may be some problem with your code. Check out the code again.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never Never Never giveup
|
|
|
technovm
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 102
Thank You
-Given: 71
-Receive: 111
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: August 09, 2011, 09:13:46 09:13 » |
|
there is no problem with the code. If i cut off the capacitor the code works or if i replace 89S52 with 89C52 the same code works. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
microkid
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 129
Thank You
-Given: 45
-Receive: 23
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: August 09, 2011, 09:33:34 09:33 » |
|
In 89S52 the pin P1.7 has extra operation(i.e. used as clock pin for ISP) compared to 89c52 which may be the cause.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never Never Never giveup
|
|
|
Rony
Inactive
Offline
Posts: 1
Thank You
-Given: 8
-Receive: 0
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: August 04, 2012, 05:08:31 17:08 » |
|
there is no problem with the code. If i cut off the capacitor the code works or if i replace 89S52 with 89C52 the same code works.  I feel the DC level maintains at pin because of cap
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
technovm
Active Member
 
Offline
Posts: 102
Thank You
-Given: 71
-Receive: 111
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: August 05, 2012, 05:43:08 05:43 » |
|
I feel the DC level maintains at pin because of cap
But if I use the same with 89C52 it works. So there is some difference in the two IC's(89C52 and 89S52) which is not mentioned in the datasheet, though they say they are same, besides the low voltage programming.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 05, 2012, 05:47:38 05:47 by technovm »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|