CCS ver 3.249 vs ver.4.088

picfan

Junior Member

Offline

Posts: 61

Thank You
-Given: 742
-Receive: 313

CCS ver 3.249 vs ver.4.088

« on: September 08, 2009, 12:56:48 12:56 »

Hello to all!

I usually work with CCS ver. 3.249 and today I have try to compile my new project on pic 18F4550 with ver. 4.088.

Result are:

VER. 3.249:

ROM used: 29780 (91%)
29780 (91%) including unused fragments

RAM used: 1043 (51%) at main() level
1215 (59%) worst case

VER.4.088:
ROM used 30024 (92%)
30024 (92%) including unused fragments

RAM used 1538 (75%) at main level
1718 (84%) worst case

Ver .4.88 use much RAM than 3.249 !!!

Bye, Picfan.


	Logged

FriskyFerret

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 560

Thank You
-Given: 513
-Receive: 360

Put it in, take it out.

Re: CCS ver 3.249 vs ver.4.088

« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2009, 04:18:59 16:18 »

Newer is not always better. I have done a lot of work professionally with v3.249 and have no complaints about it.


	Logged

Dancing pants and leotards, that's what I'm talkin' about!

yahoo

Active Member

Offline

Posts: 163

Thank You
-Given: 56
-Receive: 111

Re: CCS ver 3.249 vs ver.4.088

« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2009, 01:10:37 01:10 »

Me too. I did professionally many many projects and products using v3.249 - it is stable and reliable version. The only disadvantage I have so far is that there is no support for the newest micros and only in this case I use the latest version.


	Logged

chenyi.com

Newbie

Offline

Posts: 27

Thank You
-Given: 18
-Receive: 27

Re: CCS ver 3.249 vs ver.4.088

« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2010, 05:04:05 17:04 »

Some projects Complier Ok wtih Ver4.088. But in Ver3.249 message "Ram not enough".


	Logged

Pages: [1]

« previous next »

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?	May 02, 2025, 03:46:34 15:46
		Login with username, password and session length

	Author	Topic: CCS ver 3.249 vs ver.4.088 (Read 7492 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.