|
Title: [Que]TM4C1294XL or STM32F4 Post by: biomed12 on November 07, 2016, 08:24:19 20:24 Hello dear members,
I need a 32-bit low cost evaluation board. I want to buy an arm architecture to use its widely range support(libraries, examples, low costs..) As I wrote, which one is more comfortable or better? I observed their datasheets and I decided to buy TI's board. Bacause, its plus is rj45 connector. So, I wont need an extra ethernet module or board. *I think using the Keil IDE instead of TI's CCS. Thanks. Title: Re: [Que]TM4C1294XL or STM32F4 Post by: bogdantk on November 08, 2016, 06:36:32 06:36 It is a more advanced design for TM lot of memory on board. For me CCS works fine (in fact is a modified Eclipse) and I prefer vs Keil.
So I also recomend TI. ST is also a good choice for small projects but the support is somehow less than the TI. I have 2 projects on TM4C1294 with TI CCS and 1 with Eclipse (the first one) and everithing went smoothly with no suprises. I tryed to develop a sensor interface with STM32F4 in Eclipse but I get in trouble with some nested interrupts Title: Re: [Que]TM4C1294XL or STM32F4 Post by: biomed12 on November 08, 2016, 07:32:46 19:32 Dear bogdantk,
Have you ever had an LCD project with that kit? What do you think about this LCD screen? or Can you recommend another one? http://www.digikey.com/product-search/en?mpart=BOOSTXL-K350QVG-S1&v=296 *it it not important being touchscreen Thanks. Title: Re: [Que]TM4C1294XL or STM32F4 Post by: bogdantk on November 09, 2016, 07:24:42 07:24 No I did not use a LCD. I only use the kit as a front-end to collect data from sensors and only some state LEDs
But it seems that it will be difficult to find a better price for a LCD that the one in the link |