Sonsivri
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 09, 2024, 04:45:34 16:45


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: 1 2 [All]
Print
Author Topic: Which one is best ?  (Read 13349 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« on: September 26, 2007, 06:35:52 18:35 »

In case of Autorouting, which one is best u think for single sided board ?

Diptrace

Proteus

Eagle

Orcad Layout

Ultiboard & Ultiroute
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
knave
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27

Thank You
-Given: 28
-Receive: 102


« Reply #1 on: September 26, 2007, 06:54:58 18:54 »

I tried Eagle but the Eagle's autorouter not to good...  Orcad too complex...
Try Altium Designer, PADS or PCAD for "manual" routing plus SPECCTRA for autorouting.
Logged
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #2 on: September 27, 2007, 08:19:07 20:19 »

Does SPECCTRA is most efficient autorouter ?
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
user112
Junior Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 85

Thank You
-Given: 6
-Receive: 139


Salut tuturor(hello to all)


« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2007, 06:59:49 06:59 »

I use proteus for smoll schematics but the most eficient is manual routing or you can choose 2 sides board and manual reruoting one side just for jumpers
Logged
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2007, 07:10:49 07:10 »

But if the autorouter is efficient then the rest of unrouted trace is reduced....

Also if I route with jumper on in a layer in diptrace it will make lots of jumper. So idon't usually chose the jumper on and manually put the jumper.....
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #5 on: October 01, 2007, 03:35:14 15:35 »

Its very hard to say . everyone is very religious about their tools , I can reccomend you to try ALTIUM DESIGNER and see its efficacy yourself.

Regards
Ts
Logged
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2007, 07:58:22 07:58 »

Hi Trishtool,
Are the Altium and PADS2006 same or different..?
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #7 on: October 28, 2007, 04:42:01 16:42 »

Hi Trishtool,
Are the Altium and PADS2006 same or different..?

Not at all Altium is more close to P-CAD .  Try Altium its just wonder full, if you need search the forum or I can give you exact links right away..

TS
Logged
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #8 on: October 28, 2007, 04:43:38 16:43 »

I wanted to add one thing that is I have also use Eagle , but its autorouter doesnt seems to stand anywhere beside Altium designer.

Ts
Logged
zokij
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 346

Thank You
-Given: 269
-Receive: 679


Nice time :)


« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2007, 02:54:30 02:54 »

I try lot of different program, last one was Altium, but at the end I return to old-one Protel99SE .... if you want to have easy to use Cad with good autorouter use this ... you will have all what you have with Altium.
With any program (autorouter) you can`t finish your board. With best autorouter you still must finish about 10% of routing... or spend much more time to define autorouter rules... If you need CAD for schematics and PCB (with autorouter) and you dont need some simulation use Protel99SE.... I know this program is old (so am I) but ... I like them ... I work with PCB design long time and I start with Smart, Tango, Orcad..... and I try lot of new programs ....

 Undecided
Logged
jezo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 27

Thank You
-Given: 37
-Receive: 13


« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2007, 06:50:03 06:50 »

I agree with Zokij. Protel99 it's best choice for home. Altium Designer is unnecessarily big. And autorouter? For single sided board no one...

p.s. Protel99 needs service pack 6. It's important.
Logged
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2007, 07:41:13 07:41 »

I am using diptrace and still not satisfied with it's autorouting......
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
robertino
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 28

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 3


« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2007, 09:52:41 21:52 »

In case of Autorouting, which one is best u think for single sided board ?

as other users say Eagle is not the best tool, i have used it for some schematics and for manual circuit design, the autorouter is not efficient at all..

i like and find very usefull (and now i use this) Multisim 10 for schematics and simulation, and Ultiboard/route for autoroute...

Ciao
Roberto
Logged
Xwing
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 208

Thank You
-Given: 578
-Receive: 1529



« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2007, 07:22:21 19:22 »

Eagle + Electra for autorouting
Logged
FriskyFerret
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 560

Thank You
-Given: 513
-Receive: 360


Put it in, take it out.


WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2007, 11:21:21 23:21 »

Quote
In case of Autorouting, which one is best u think for single sided board ?

Diptrace

Proteus

Eagle

Orcad Layout

Ultiboard & Ultiroute


Some boards ban "which is best" posts because all it does is create useless traffic. I can see their point but until it becomes a problem here I will add my opinion.

For autorouting of single-sided boards the "best" package, in my interpretation of the word, is OrCAD Layout Plus. It will autoroute and auto-insert variable length jumpers as needed. The down side is that its a complicated package to learn for those accustomed to simple software like Proteus,  Diptrace, or Eagle. I once used OrCAD Layout but now use PADS.

Who wants to autoroute a single-sided board?

There are two classes of users:
  • Hobbyists who want to fabricate their own board.
  • Professional layout designers in the consumer electronics industry (read China) who are driven to layout on a single-sided board to reduce costs. Take a typical computer monitor apart. The main PCB will often be of significant size and complexity but be single-sided. A lot of effort and skill went in to designing that board so the manufacturer could save $2.43 each on 300,000 boards.

Basic Notes on the Autorouters

Diptrace
The built-in autorouter is pure rubbish. It can do a simple board but then anyone could do a simple board by hand, too. Diptrace is a respectable package but it must be used with Electra.

Proteus
The autorouter isn't terrible but it should be used with Electra, too. The built-in router has problems with fan-outs and proper handling of surface mount components. It does a "good enough" job with thru-hole, especially with Electra. Using the built-in autorouter with surface mount, high density devices can get really  strange.

Eagle
The autorouter is fairly primitive. Again, Electra should be used.

Orcad Layout
The built-in shape-based autorouter is quite respectable. It has SPECCTRA as a add-in, the mother of all autorouters, though most hobbyists haven't a clue how to use it.

Ultiboard & Ultiroute
The autorouter in this package mostly stinks. I can't remember if it does auto-insertion of jumpers or not.


For beginners, as someone suggested, Protel 99 SE with SP6, or Pulsonix v4.6 makes an excellent general purpose capture and layout package. The autorouter in Protel 99SE is just barely acceptable (way better than Diptrace, Eagle or Proteus) but will do a reasonable job. The one in Pulsonix is very good, competing with SPECCTRA and a lot easier to set up and run.

Don't be put off that Protel 99 SE is 8 years old. It is still a very good, complete package with almost no bugs. Protel 99 SE also has a good manual to teach you how to use it, as does Pulsonix.

« Last Edit: October 30, 2007, 11:47:53 23:47 by FriskyFerret » Logged

Dancing pants and leotards, that's what I'm talkin' about!
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2007, 02:59:48 14:59 »

Hi FriskyFerret,
      How can I use Electra with Diptrace ?
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
avralam
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 140

Thank You
-Given: 153
-Receive: 30


« Reply #16 on: October 31, 2007, 04:42:17 16:42 »

Hi Maxpayne!
Do not waste time for singlesided autorouter! You cannot see normal PCB! Good visible result can you see only with manual routing. I making PCB with Sprint Layout5. All dimensions and commands are on the screen.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2007, 09:06:22 09:06 by avralam » Logged
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #17 on: November 01, 2007, 09:28:51 09:28 »

I try lot of different program, last one was Altium, but at the end I return to old-one Protel99SE .... if you want to have easy to use Cad with good autorouter use this ... you will have all what you have with Altium.
With any program (autorouter) you can`t finish your board. With best autorouter you still must finish about 10% of routing... or spend much more time to define autorouter rules... If you need CAD for schematics and PCB (with autorouter) and you dont need some simulation use Protel99SE.... I know this program is old (so am I) but ... I like them ... I work with PCB design long time and I start with Smart, Tango, Orcad..... and I try lot of new programs ....

 Undecided

Well when I was using Protel99SE with all service packs applied I use to get hell lot errors on Windows98SE , The program used to crash many times , but with DXP or altium upgrade no such crashes are there. One thing more auto router also depends on the track widths you choose , I feel Altium has made a lot of changes in the routing topology then that was in earlier versons , Traxmaker , protel 3.xx, protel99Se, DXp and now Altium. evolution is on . I suggested because its free to dowload here , downloaded latest Altium from sonsivri only 1.4Gb full.

Regards
Ts   
Logged
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #18 on: November 01, 2007, 03:15:49 15:15 »

But i don't have much speed here to download such a biggy..!!!  1.4Gb

I am gonna such the torrent...
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #19 on: November 02, 2007, 11:36:41 11:36 »

MAXPAYNE ,  Actually you have to do compromises , If you have limited speed you can try Eagle , I feel its good for hobby type projects but certainly not for professional design , I ts only 11MB ,in size .Worth the size .  I am a little confused what for do you need the PCB design software I mean what is your application?

Ts
Logged
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #20 on: November 02, 2007, 11:48:25 11:48 »

MAXPAYNE , Try this PCB design software TRAXMAKER and I am sure youll get in love with it , the simplicity and ease of youse will take you away , I have just uploaded this and it has its pass onside the ZIP .

http://rapidshare.com/files/66907893/circuit-maker.zip.html

TrIsHooL
Logged
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #21 on: November 02, 2007, 01:31:28 13:31 »

Trishool, I usually do my pcb work with traxmaker and diptrace....

traxmaker and sprint laout is really simple for starting with pcb design....
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
FriskyFerret
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 560

Thank You
-Given: 513
-Receive: 360


Put it in, take it out.


WWW
« Reply #22 on: November 03, 2007, 04:40:02 04:40 »

Quote
Well when I was using Protel99SE with all service packs applied I use to get hell lot errors on Windows98SE , The program used to crash many times.

I've used it off and on for years on Win9X machines, WinNT, Win2K and never had a problem. I've known many others that have never had a problem, either.

People always blame some specific application for crashing a Win9X system, or more often, the OS itself. The problem usually is that the system was already unstable due to some poorly written driver or a corrupt file system.

As far as Altium Designer, it's a 2.2 Gig install and requires the newest and fastest hardware just to run it. It doesn't come with a manual, only small fragmented learning guides and has more bugs than you can shake a stick at.

Protel 99 SE SP6 is less than 100 Meg, has a very complete manual, very few bugs and will do anything a student or hobbyist would want.

You decide.
Logged

Dancing pants and leotards, that's what I'm talkin' about!
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #23 on: November 03, 2007, 08:04:41 08:04 »

I've used it off and on for years on Win9X machines, WinNT, Win2K and never had a problem. I've known many others that have never had a problem, either.

People always blame some specific application for crashing a Win9X system, or more often, the OS itself. The problem usually is that the system was already unstable due to some poorly written driver or a corrupt file system.

As far as Altium Designer, it's a 2.2 Gig install and requires the newest and fastest hardware just to run it. It doesn't come with a manual, only small fragmented learning guides and has more bugs than you can shake a stick at.

Protel 99 SE SP6 is less than 100 Meg, has a very complete manual, very few bugs and will do anything a student or hobbyist would want.

You decide.

I am not denying that Protel 99SE isnt worth using . I have done a lot of design with Protel 99SE ,But with windowsXP you require protel DXP 99SE I couldnt make to run , if I remember correctly , The errors that I used to get were when I use to export sch to PCB , no such as related to RAM or CPU .Maybe I used some different crack on it and you used a different one.

Ts   
Logged
zokij
Senior Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 346

Thank You
-Given: 269
-Receive: 679


Nice time :)


« Reply #24 on: November 10, 2007, 03:23:11 03:23 »

I still use PROTEL99SE with all service pack on windows XP when I need good help of autorouter with PCB... without problem. If you need help , assistance , probably I can help you to use right way witth step by step procedure of installing and cracking ...
And about Altium Designer I try on few project but I cant see nothing more (only if you have companion and make corporate work) but for use simplicity and quickly for me is still Protel99se....
Logged
ppa88
Active Member
***
 Muted
Offline Offline

Posts: 200

Thank You
-Given: 49
-Receive: 131


« Reply #25 on: November 10, 2007, 06:38:30 06:38 »

I have used Protel99SE under Win98 and XP and I must say it had problems with 98. But with XP Pro SP 2 , it is quite stable. The only care you have to take is make regular backps of your work as you proceed. A brilliant package for a beginner, it has got a nice database approach for storing your project. Its autorouter is more than average and will require good tuning as any other. (Remember there is no better router than a sound human brain!). But then Protel were good enough to provide the Specctra interface , so if you have that, then you are in driver's seat, (Specctra is the best autorouter I have seen). The greatest feature of this software is what is called "GLOBAL EDITING" which I have not seen anywhere. What a brilliant concept !

The downside of Protel99 is absence of PIN and GATE swap and the non integration of the device symbol and package into a single entity (as has been done in Eagle for eg.). This inconvinience was taken care of in DXP and Altium Designer. AD is a professional level package with a great FPGA design integration, but it may put off a newbie because of its being a huge huge package with too many features. And some of the features which were easy to do in Protel99 are difficult to do in AD (eg., global editing is a bit of a pain in AD).The situs autorouter is criticised for being unstable for complicated designs but again the specctra interface is there.

Eagle - Good package for small PCBs , a huge library available and it is easy to add your components

PCAD - Similar to Protel in features but more difficult to use

Traxmaker - Good for amateur work

Most people in industry say that Pads PowerPCB, Zuken Cadstar and Cadene Allegro are the preferred ones but I think they are too costly and I really don't know if third party libraries are available easily. (Protel 99SE  and Eagle are winners in this)

These are my views in brief, of course people may differ.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2007, 06:42:36 06:42 by ppa88 » Logged
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #26 on: November 10, 2007, 07:05:26 07:05 »


And some of the features which were easy to do in Protel99 are difficult to do in AD (eg., global editing is a bit of a pain in AD).The situs autorouter is criticised for being unstable for complicated designs but again the specctra interface is there.

PPa88 ,
 I am not able to comprehend,  global editing you are talking about . Please elobrate , do you mean multi documents (schematics) interconnect, I have been using Altium DXP with SP4 , situs autorouter  is just fine . Are you talking about the latest software of Altium Designer V6.6  , what problems are there in the Auto router, that you have encountered .

Ts 
Logged
ppa88
Active Member
***
 Muted
Offline Offline

Posts: 200

Thank You
-Given: 49
-Receive: 131


« Reply #27 on: November 10, 2007, 07:22:47 07:22 »

By global editing I mean the facility to do multiple changes with a single operation. This feature is activated by double clicking on a component on a PCB or Schematic and then clicking on the Global button.  The "Attributes to Match by"  and "Copy Attributes" choices which open then give you amazing control on the multiple changes that can be done in a single operation.This is a truly great feature in my opinion. The same operation in AD is not as simple to do as in 99SE for a newbie.

As far as the situs autorouter is concerned, I have not used it personally as I always use Specctra. However I have seen criticism for the same (in situations where it has to follow many rules) on other forums. They might have improved it in 6.6.
Logged
SONSiVRi
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1621

Thank You
-Given: 75
-Receive: 405



WWW
« Reply #28 on: November 10, 2007, 08:04:14 08:04 »


Some boards ban "which is best" posts because all it does is create useless traffic. I can see their point but until it becomes a problem here I will add my opinion.

go for it, its knowledge.
Logged

- Houston, we have a problem.
Ahmad_k
SCG Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 747

Thank You
-Given: 169
-Receive: 1289



« Reply #29 on: November 11, 2007, 07:38:37 07:38 »

I think each software have a bug, but for me i use OrCad Capture to draw the schematic because it is the best one, it is very easy in editing components in place. and then i use the Protel Dxp to place the components and manual route, i dont use autorouter. After that i use eagle to generate a 3D Pcb by redrawing the components only in Eagle layout.   Grin Grin Grin . I have a laboratory, me and my team create a professional PCB using these steps.

But the good news exists in OrCad 16. Cadence had removed LAYOUT and integrates the Allegro layout which is the best of the best, and integrate a powerfull components autoplacer, you can see a demo on the www.cadence.com

So i will wait until the Orcad 16 becomes cracked

Logged
Trishool
Active Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 9



« Reply #30 on: November 11, 2007, 09:47:17 09:47 »

By global editing I mean the facility to do multiple changes with a single operation. This feature is activated by double clicking on a component on a PCB or Schematic and then clicking on the Global button.  The "Attributes to Match by"  and "Copy Attributes" choices which open then give you amazing control on the multiple changes that can be done in a single operation.This is a truly great feature in my opinion. The same operation in AD is not as simple to do as in 99SE for a newbie.

As far as the situs autorouter is concerned, I have not used it personally as I always use Specctra. However I have seen criticism for the same (in situations where it has to follow many rules) on other forums. They might have improved it in 6.6.


I will use thie feature , I want to add one thing to the Situs auto router AD DXP and that is , even though you set design rules , and it shows 100% connection complete , the DRC reports short circuit voilations that the situs makes delibrately and the width constraints arnt followed strictly , \otherwise the auto router is the best one I could see . 
Logged
ppa88
Active Member
***
 Muted
Offline Offline

Posts: 200

Thank You
-Given: 49
-Receive: 131


« Reply #31 on: November 11, 2007, 04:09:24 16:09 »

even though you set design rules , and it shows 100% connection complete , the DRC reports short circuit voilations that the situs makes delibrately and the width constraints arnt followed strictly ,

This can be a potentially serious problem especially for a complex pcb design, I hope Altium takes care of this in their next release.
Logged
Prommer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29

Thank You
-Given: 55
-Receive: 24


« Reply #32 on: November 24, 2007, 03:44:36 15:44 »

Eagle is world wide in use and there are a lot of library avaiable via www.cadsoft.de (Libs are free).

The better performance for professional user is Altium Designer. You can made the complete devolopent with it. Schematic, Simulation, Layout, FPGA ......

I'm using Eagle, P-CAD and Altium Designer and the best is Altium Desinger, but last two are very expensive
(for Professional use).
Logged
eibol
Guest
« Reply #33 on: November 24, 2007, 10:18:42 22:18 »

Eagle is very easy to use ! and work under linux
Logged
mviboolr
Guest
« Reply #34 on: November 25, 2007, 12:46:44 00:46 »

Hi friends
     I prefer Eagle. It's easy to used and small.
mviboolr
Logged
id2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8

Thank You
-Given: 2
-Receive: 2


« Reply #35 on: January 07, 2008, 04:44:41 16:44 »

For single-side pcb I use protel99se but manual routing
Logged
ugur
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 12

Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 0


« Reply #36 on: January 09, 2008, 07:24:06 07:24 »

I use proteus. I think is so good.
I write a robbot code with jal. Pic 16f877 controls 32 servo motor with brain. Proteus simulates robbot so really.
Logged
memed500
Guest
« Reply #37 on: January 10, 2008, 12:21:38 12:21 »

Orcad Layout is best.
Logged
sammm
Guest
« Reply #38 on: January 11, 2008, 05:25:44 17:25 »

I use pulsonix autorouter and I think that  it doesn't work very well. I think that if you want a good routing you have to do a manual routing! Anycase also if u want only to link pads, pulsonix autorouter is not a dragon!

Posted on: January 11, 2008, 06:23:45 18:23 - Automerged

Which are feature that make an autorouter a good autorouter?
Logged
shibuv
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 30

Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 7


WWW
« Reply #39 on: January 14, 2008, 10:21:32 10:21 »


proteus is best for micro controller

Logged
nine9
Guest
« Reply #40 on: January 21, 2008, 07:26:43 19:26 »

i prefer eagle for small projects but didn't like the new beta version
Logged
munaf
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29

Thank You
-Given: 0
-Receive: 2


« Reply #41 on: January 22, 2008, 04:51:55 04:51 »

protel 99SE is the best one from others.  you can get help via email  from protel company for any problem.  they repply very soon.
Logged
sheriefaly
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 15

Thank You
-Given: 3
-Receive: 4


« Reply #42 on: January 22, 2008, 12:39:05 12:39 »

orcad is the best
Logged
eLAB
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11

Thank You
-Given: 1
-Receive: 4


« Reply #43 on: January 22, 2008, 01:24:35 13:24 »

And what if we want to use legal version?

What is a price of Proteus, Protel, Orcad etc? Shocked

Eagle is affordable and Diptrace also... Diptrace is now released in version 1.50 beta. Surely progressing...
Yes, autorouter is not the best side of this sw but in newer versions it will be corrected (I hope!)....
Eagle is very good but when editing finished boards, it`s weaker then diptrace...

Vote for diptrace Wink
Logged
irvinos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10

Thank You
-Given: 29
-Receive: 28


« Reply #44 on: January 22, 2008, 07:51:42 19:51 »

Try Electra. It comes with PROTEUS. electra is more smart than ARES autorouter.
Logged
yangzy
Guest
« Reply #45 on: January 23, 2008, 12:41:03 00:41 »

Protel 99se is easy to start,you can try it.
Logged
ashu.spect
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26

Thank You
-Given: 9
-Receive: 3


« Reply #46 on: January 23, 2008, 08:32:52 08:32 »

Eagle is best in free softwares but professionally Altium designer(previously Protel) is the best

Ashu
Logged
MAXPAYNE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 697

Thank You
-Given: 493
-Receive: 363


It's a little funny......


« Reply #47 on: January 23, 2008, 07:24:38 19:24 »

topic locked
Logged

Whats the Craziest Project u have done lately...?
Pages: 1 2 [All]
Print
Jump to:  


DISCLAIMER
WE DONT HOST ANY ILLEGAL FILES ON THE SERVER
USE CONTACT US TO REPORT ILLEGAL FILES
ADMINISTRATORS CANNOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR USERS POSTS AND LINKS

... Copyright © 2003-2999 Sonsivri.to ...
Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC | HarzeM Dilber MC